just got this PM

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I don't recall Japan being the land of knockoffs during their rise to economic prosperity. .



Oh no?
How about cars, TVs, radios, cameras, fiber optics?
All that stuff started here and was copied by the Japs.
 
Oh no?
How about cars, TVs, radios, cameras, fiber optics?
All that stuff started here and was copied by the Japs.

That's just not my recollection of the 60's and 70's emergence of Japanese manufacturing.

I don't recall the jap cars being knock offs, in fact I remember them being quite different from the American muscle cars in the 60's and 70's. Just wait, Chinese cars will be here in a year or two. I have visions of less than early Kia but better than a Yugo or Trabant.

Nicolaus August Otto
Nicolaus August Otto invented the gas motor engine in 1876.
Gottlieb Daimler
In 1885, Gottlieb Daimler invented a gas engine that allowed for a revolution in car design.

Karl Benz (Carl Benz)
Karl Benz was the German mechanical engineer who designed and in 1885 built the world's first practical automobile to be powered by an internal-combustion engine.

John Lambert
America's first gasoline-powered automobile was the 1891 Lambert car invented by John W. Lambert.

Fiber optics was researched around the world. Alot of was done in the US but the Japanese and other countries are quite capable researchers in some areas:

The 850 nm region was initially attractive because the technology for light emitters at this wavelength had already been perfected in visible indicator LEDs. Low-cost silicon detectors could also be used at the 850 nm wavelength. As technology progressed, the first window became less attractive because of its relatively high 3 dB/km loss limit.

Most companies jumped to the “second window” at 1310 nm with lower attenuation of about 0.5 dB/km. In late 1977, Nippon Telegraph and Telephone (NTT) developed the “third window” at 1550 nm. It offered the theoretical minimum optical loss for silica-based fibers, about 0.2 dB/km.

How much original design goes into a radio?

Again with photography the history does not start here:

Louis-Jacques-Mandé Daguerre, inventor of the first practical process of photography, was born near Paris, France on November 18, 1789. In 1829, he formed a partnership with Joseph Nicéphore Niépce to improve the process Niépce had developed to take the first permanent photograph in 1826-1827. Niépce died in 1833.

After several years of experimentation, Daguerre developed a more convenient and effective method of photography, naming it after himself -- the daguerreotype. In 1839, he and Niépce's son sold the rights for the daguerreotype to the French government and published a booklet describing the process.

I don't remember the Japanese sets being knock offs, but I do remember Zenith, GE and RCA sets going down the tubes in quality. To the point where they could not beat the japanese sets in quality.

My point is that the Japanese have brought their own innovations to the market. They were once thought of as the land of cheap goods as was Taiwan/Singapore and now China, not necessarily knock-offs although I am sure there were some. But they did innovate on their own as can be seen by the quality of their products in many areas. The japanese did not get where they are by staying cheap, they won by being the best quality value in their markets. You can see the Koreans doing the same, not quite there but they are doing well.

The Chinese on the other hand are doing the cheap product/labor route but they are not simultaneously innovating on their own. They are buying that innovation through American and other companies. They are not protecting the IPR of others. Their steel is crap. They lie. I have seen a few similar letters in different market areas. They all compare themselves to quality manufacturers but you know they are crap.

I don't recall the Japanese knocking one of our reconaissance planes out of the sky in international airspace, holding our crew hostage and shipping the plane back to us in pieces and charging us airport fees. No apology for the behavior of their pilot. I don't recall an apology for the recent pet food poisonings. I see alot of third world opportunists. We'll just have to wait and see how they evolve.
 
I don't recall the jap cars being knock offs,

Just look under some of those 70's and early 80's Japanese cars. I'm familiar with Datsuns. Miniature GM suspensions. The Datsun A series engine came from the MG Midget/Austin Healey Sprite that's why you can bolt a Datsun trans to a Spridget. And Honda didn't invent front wheel drive.

Currently, go look at a Nissan Titan and tell me they weren't looking at the Ford F150.
 
Currently, go look at a Nissan Titan and tell me they weren't looking at the Ford F150.

The 2004 Titan does look similar to the 2004 F-150, but how would Nissan have got the look of the F-150 before it was released? Personally I think both the trucks look ugly compared to the beauty in my avatar.:D
 
The 2004 Titan does look similar to the 2004 F-150, but how would Nissan have got the look of the F-150 before it was released? Personally I think both the trucks look ugly compared to the beauty in my avatar.:D

They do look alike. I was going by what one of my friends that bought the Titan told me. He drove all the trucks and bought the Titan because his wife worked for Nissan and he got a good deal. His comment didn't particuliarly pertain to the look but the whole truck.
 
Could be that they are using crappy base stock for their oil use????

Perhaps as their technology in the area increases they will recommend 50:1 like the rest of the civilized world.

Or, the saws are complete crap, and need that much oil in the mix to not fly apart.


Chuck
 
I am not a mechanic in any way. If you say the engineering was a knockoff then I would have to defer to you :bowdown: . What I do believe is that the Japanese put together an entirely different package than the US manufacturers did. The only cars I can think of that were equivalent to the small jap box economy cars were Hornets, Chevelles, Gremlins, Pacers and Pintos. They just did not compare to the styling, reliability and price of the Japanese cars, even back then. The Korean and Chinese cars are cheaper but they don't have the reliability, although I think the Koreans are rising.

Point was that there is a fine line between copying and not reinventing the wheel. I don't see China inventing anything as of yet except for a buy your market share on steroids plan. They have a long way to go until they can be an economic power as other than a people and widget shop.

Unfortunately/fortunately the Japanese are retrying their grab at the large truck market. Bad because they are doing better this time. Not the equivalent full on iron that Detroit can build but they are doing it smarter and with their reliability. I had to dump my Chevy P/U because it was too expensive to maintain. I can't tell you how disappointed I was to have to do that. Fortunately this is another opportunity for Detroit to step up, solve their long term debt issues, fix their cars and be competitive. Unfortunately, history is not on their side.

Anyway, everyone has their opinion on the matter and there probably is not a lot of difference in those opinions when the minutiae is left aside.

:sucks:

I wanted to buy a small axe the other day. Lowes has their Kobalt brand with a proud, bold sticker saying American grown hickory handle. Yeah...the head is crappy Chinese tool steel. Same thing with my Razorback edger I bought and another manufacturers scraper. All the tool steel is Chinese. I want to throw the crap away, but I can't find a manufacturer that gets other than poor quality Chinese steel.
 
Last edited:
chinese steel isn`t near as bad as you think, in fact lately they`ve been producing a more consistent product then north america, would I prefer to support american steel? of course I would but when all a supplier has is foreign steel thats what I get to work with.

alot of other chinese exports are total crap though.
 
chinese steel isn`t near as bad as you think, in fact lately they`ve been producing a more consistent product then north america, would I prefer to support american steel? of course I would but when all a supplier has is foreign steel thats what I get to work with.

alot of other chinese exports are total crap though.

I did not like the steel when I looked at it, I found the China markings later. I have not seen US steel lately and I don't know if I will given the state of US steel. I agree, you don't always get a choice.
 
Brian, I think you should go for this offer from the guy that PMed you. Sounds like an awesome opportunity.
 
I wanted to buy a small axe the other day. Lowes has their Kobalt brand with a proud, bold sticker saying American grown hickory handle. Yeah...the head is crappy Chinese tool steel. Same thing with my Razorback edger I bought and another manufacturers scraper. All the tool steel is Chinese. I want to throw the crap away, but I can't find a manufacturer that gets other than poor quality Chinese steel.

Seems like more and more, all the products at big box stores are Chinese. I did find/buy a small Fiskar hand axe at lowes a while ago. Chinese are big funders or Sudanese govt. (Darfur) That is another HUGE difference between Japanese and Chinese
 

Latest posts

Back
Top