a qualified arborist could make four cuts and restore symmetry and greatly increase the level of safety, all in a few hours’ time
with the intended cuts to be made as shown, that tree will be what the utility calls ground to sky & sloped back, kinda wondering what the I-beam will be used for & why?
the preservation attempts in this case honestly........outweigh the commonsense fact............this tree`s root zone & trunk location are compromised & will worsen in time & with the suggested trimming, wont resemble what this specie is suppose to, so cosmetically along with structurally......not a winning battle.
sometimes ya just have to take em down, what will this thing look like when your done, will it be pleasing? will it be worth it? if it fails whos responsible? etc...
this is a case of going too far to save a tree IMHO!
LXT...........
I agree with ya to a point, but this is not in a wide open field, or within a fenced in area depicting that such is a historical site/tree.
this tree appears to be a "street" tree as we call them & runs a higher risk in declining, not improving!
I agree that we need to assess taking trees down & many have needlessly been removed, However....lets not have the pendulum swing the other way were we are saving the ones that should have been removed, I see this alot.
One of the Arborists in a small city not far from me....saves every thing & many trees similar as to what was depicted here! of the 23 trees he said should remain.....only 8 are still standing & the planning commision/council have asked for me to re-inspect the trees & report on their condition.
I was the Co. hired to remove these trees, the causes for such range from uprooting to canopy breakout to splitting/select limb fallout, etc.. im just saying sometimes we need to use commonsense! trees are living organisms & therefore much like us they die & usually become a severe hazard in this type of situation!
LXT..............
I hear what you are saying. It is the human condition that we swing from one extreme (chop em all down) to another (save all the trees). I believe it is our job as arborists to use our skills and knowledge to define what is "savable" and what isn't. As I do not know this species or location I cannot say what is the best choice here but given the significance of this tree I believe that if it is possible to preserve it we should. It is possible to move a mountain so why not move a footpath?
I hear what you are saying. It is the human condition that we swing from one extreme (chop em all down) to another (save all the trees). I believe it is our job as arborists to use our skills and knowledge to define what is "savable" and what isn't. As I do not know this species or location I cannot say what is the best choice here but given the significance of this tree I believe that if it is possible to preserve it we should. It is possible to move a mountain so why not move a footpath?
Enter your email address to join: