http://www.trailtech.net/722-et3
What you think if this?
That's more or less what I have and being a contact thermometer and will lag too far behind the real temp inside the saw.
An EGT gauge will be a lot quicker
http://www.trailtech.net/722-et3
What you think if this?
Just speaking from my experience with my old husky saws, I noticed a slight power improvement running a bit richer than 40:1 when I had to make extended heavy cuts, and once they were ported, they really appreciated the extra oil of 32:1. If I do mostly limbing, and cutting small stuff, the leaner mix is fine.
But I'm going to continue using the term "lean mix", because if you really get down to it, "Lean" means Not fat, and that refers to oil!.. There is a difference between not enough fuel in the air, and not enough oil in the fuel
Someone must have been reallllly bored to go back into a topic that is 4-1/2 years old
Scott (whew, shoveling is hard) B
I thought the 880 had a limited coil, not a limited carb.I've been reading these threads scouring actually debating on leaving my 880 stock with limited carb now does this mean I'm in the already lean department? Jesus I got to say the fear factor has made me wonder or re think about getting this saws carb reworked or should I just leave it alone?
Yea what he said the adjustment on this ms 880 is very little caps I meant. Is it fine cutting caps and leaving coil as it is ? All these threads have made me paranoid as $&)@
The last thing I want is to pooch this thing milling.. I am actually doubting myself with this saw now. Last thing I want is to burn it up so I've been scouring threads reading as much info as possible every time I read something good I find 4 things bad said... Set my mind at ease please...
I usually run 50-1 for firewood and 40-1 for milling. Watch brads video on tuning. listen for that blubber and if it not doing it you need to tune it. 661 is an auto tune. I haven't heard of anyone milling with it yet. You may be the first.Alright good I'm gonna take and the 661 out shortly with smaller bar and chop wood with it for break in. After that will then hook up to mill.
We started at 10:1, and went to 100:1. Our results showed that a two-stroke engine makes its best power at 18:1. Any more oil than that, and the engine ran poorly, because we didn't have any jets rich enough to compensate for that much oil in the fuel. The power loss from 18:1 to 32:1 was approximately 2 percent. The loss from 18:1 to 50:1 was nearly 9 percent. On a modern 250, that can be as much as 4 horsepower. The loss from 18:1 to 100:1 was nearly 18 percent. The reason for the difference in output is simple. More oil provides a better seal between the ring and the cylinder wall.
Now, I realize that 18:1 is impractical unless you ride your engine all-out, keeping it pinned at all times. But running reasonable ratios no less than 32:1 will produce more power, and give your engine better protection, thus making it perform better for longer.
In analysing the circumstance I'd be asking myself the following
How does a bar get pinched when milling?
What type of wood were you cutting?
How long had it been since the chain was sharpened?
What fuel/lube mix are you running?
How many RPM below max have you got the H screw set at ?
How much pushing was happening?
Fear of this is what leads me to this.
I reckon your cylinder is salvageable.
Enter your email address to join: