lokin for a 50 to 55 cc chain saw

[mrk585]

I did some reasearch today and was told that the ms 260 pro is a better saw
much more so after modifcation

 

[fishhuntcutwood]

I did some reasearch today and was told that the ms 260 pro is a better saw
much more so after modifcation

Yep.

 

[mrk585]

how so
what kind of mods how to do these mods

 

[fishhuntcutwood]

how so
what kind of mods how to do these mods

The 260 has a better power to weight ratio, a vertically split case, option for decomp valve, etc. Do a search on this site for "professional vs. homeowner" and you'll get some readiong.

As far as the mods, a muffler mod will go a long way on any saw. Do a search for "muffler mod" if you haven't already.

Jeff

 

[mrk585]

any other suggestions

 

[SawTroll]

Only the obvious ones - Dolmar PS-5100 and Husky 353, in that order of priority.
The Dolmar weight slightly more (but still less than the 280) and lack the decomp valve, but there is a power difference that should be notisable.
Both should cost less than the MS260, and have better antivibe and air filtration.
You will find a lot of info on both if you do a couple of searches.

I still think the MS280 deal look good though, if you can get it without the QCB, or you can disable it.
The QSA is possible to live with if you are willing to spend a few minutes extra when doing maitenence.

 

[pinus]

mrk587, if you look the price too, not only the tech data and reputation, then MS260 is overpriced. MS-260 is justifing itself if you are pro and will "kill" the saw as you can, evry day, evrywhere.
If you will use saw pleasantly and seasonly MS270/280 can do the work as well.

 

[mrk585]

well My thinking is that i can get one for somewhat cheap from where i work so I want to get a saw that is a nice saw that will last me a long time

 

[logbutcher]

"how's Your Chain Filing Skills ?"

This is not a complete sentence. It is forbidden. What is wrong with this poster ?

 

[buck futter]

I will recommend the Husky 350, it has many pro features. Decomp valve, adj oiler, fully adjustable carb, it comes with a nk setup, the anti vibe is the same as the pro line and it comes with the air injection like all huskys. I also believe that it has a metal clutch cover, but I may be mistaken.

It has a horizontally split crankcase which is typically found on homeowner saws, however it is split once again at the base of the jug like a pro saw that has a vertically split crankcase. This is the only saw in the series that is like that the 340 & 345 have a traditional 2 piece horizontally split case. The crankcase is enshrouded with plastic but I don't think it will adversely affect the durability in most situations provided the owner has even a shred of respect for his equipment. Also the displacement is exactly what you specified at 52 cc.

I also believe there is a two year warranty on these. My favorite part is that it will by far be the most kind on your wallet.

good luck

Lucky
AKA buck

 

[SawTroll]

Lucky, I agree that the 350 is a nice saw, but I think the clutch cover of the 350 is plastic.
The 350 is also lacking the very nice quick release air filter/top cover of the 353.

The new 51.7 cc engine probably is a downrated version of the 353 engine. Rated power is the same as with the old 49.4 cc engine, not the same as the 353.

It is a "homeowner" quality saw, even though it is one of the very best of those. It is not designed to hold up as long (or good) as the 353/346xp according to my Husky dealer.

 

[buck futter]

http://www.npeco.com/
This is my source about the metal clutch cover. the information is found under the husqvarna stihl comparison with the 350. The received their information from the manucturers in august of 2005. I wouldn't doubt at all that the 350 jug is now the same as the 353 jug with a slightly downrated spec of .1 hp. which could easily just be a number game that husky is playing to keep things in line.
The 350 doesn't have the quick detach top end cover and does have a plastic oil tank, but other than that can you enlighten me as to how the 350 is significantly different from the 353 other than being almost a half pound heavier?

Thanks
Lucky

 

[BIG JAKE]

mrk585 I didn't see any comment on saw shops-maybe going blind. Consider that too. Lot's of Stihl shops around but the only Husky shops I actually know of where I am are Lowes stores and most of those folks wouldn't know what a bar nut is. But anywhere you go I think you'll find this often holds true. Not always, just something to consider. If you don't mind waiting a week to get that part it's a non-issue. But I like the fact that many of those Stihl shops, if they don't have a part, probably also have a bone yard. I got a vibe mount for my 028 that way. Diameter was too big(off a different saw) but a few minutes on the grinder and I was back in business. When I want to cut I don't want to jack around on the internet. Good info resource also

 

[94TahoeLT]

Now that's intersting, as they aren't even close... How did you arrive at your conclusion? 25.4cc= 1 cubic inch....

If you need help converting it goes like this.

cc x .06102 = ci
ci x 16.39 = cc

I hope that helps

 

[SawTroll]

http://www.npeco.com/
... but other than that can you enlighten me as to how the 350 is significantly different from the 353 other than being almost a half pound heavier? ...

As far as I know, the entire bottom end, including the crank assambly, is different and supposed to be longer lasting on the 353.
They belong to two different series (families) of saws, in spite of the similar looks - but I think you really know that, so why are you asking?

 

[Jim Mesthene]

Another vote for the 350.

It's 25.4 millimeters to the linear inch.

 

[buck futter]

Sawtroll,
I wasn't sure about the bottom end, I can't remember if I heard that it is the same as the 346/353 or not, I may be thinking of the 351. It would be interesting to see how the 350 would hold up. I thought of another difference I think the 350 has a spur sprocket. Overall the 350 seems to be quite a value if I needed a saw this size I would definately give it a shot.

Lucky
AKA buck

 

[SawTroll]

Lucky, if you look at the IPLs you will see that all the parts in the bottom end is different, with the possible exception of the "naked" crankshaft (no part number on that part alone).

I have not looked into the 351, but it was the predesessor of the 353 and belonged to the 346xp family. That meens that it should have the same bottom end.

I agree that the 350 is a good value, and I have recommended it several times at this and other forums. An lot of 350s and 345s are in use around here, and they hold up quite good according to my dealer - the 353 is a longer lasting saw though.
In my mind the 350s main competition is the Stihl MS250 and maybe the 270 though, and not the saws recommended earlier in this tread.

The 353 is slightly more saw and also cost just slightly more - so take your pick.

 

[Lakeside53]

If you need help converting it goes like this.

cc x .06102 = ci
ci x 16.39 = cc

I hope that helps

Yes, I was way off!