t_r,
The chains you specified are all full complement chains.
Perhaps you'd be interested in
http://www.oregonchain.com/38.htm where it states that the "JP/LP" chains are "low vibration"?
At the risk of offending you, I'd like to recommend you visit
http://madsens1.com/oregon4.htm and look it over. Then read through
http://madsens1.com/oregon5.htm as well. Finally, read through
http://madsens1.com/oregon2.htm (where they erroneously use the word "compliment" [as in "I like your saw"] instead of "complement" [meaning quantity or amount]).
Some here say to take the depth gauges down progressively further than .025 as the cutter length decreases, so maintaining consistent cutting efficiency. I can see that, and agree, but I don't believe it's necessarily for the reasons usually stated (angles of attack &c.) as much as it is that the top plate is getting narrower and therefore not slicing as much wood. Since that's the case, the chips would necessarily be smaller (less "efficiency" as compared to new) but that also means the depth of cut can be set proportionately greater so that the same amount of chip is produced (new chain "efficiency") as when the cutters are wider.
You say you take the "rakers" down another .001 (mil) which is fairly inconsequential if practically measurable.
Until you had specified the chain you are using, I (and I think several others) thought you were speaking of the bumpers on either the drive links or tie straps, as the "safety chains" are variously configured. Those bumpers would in fact leave some less room for chips, especially in long cuts.
For an interesting idea in cutters, have a look at the Bullet chain (not for trees) at
http://cuttersedge.com/