These were common among the larger frame models... (1-x series, 250's, etc.)
So did the last large frame saws get the new style branding in the castings?
These were common among the larger frame models... (1-x series, 250's, etc.)
I don't know, myself. You got my curiosity up and I just randomly did some searching on '10-10 clutch covers' and ran across several like the above for the larger frame saws also. There are black ones as well.
As for the 10-series short covers, there appear to be 4 of the 'circle' version -- with logo and site, without logo but site, without logo, and logo without site. Interesting.
I'm only familiar with the one McC logo.
have a belgium s10-10 here.
was kinda surprised to see that when i got it
Jethro, where were your saws built? They were also made in Australia, Japan, Belgium and Canada.
I'd still like something definite on the 700 vs 7-10 porting but however I'm not measuring lol
When Tim mentioned checking through the plug hole on his SP80/81, that's the first thing I thought of as a possible way to compare the 700 and 7-10 cylinders without having to tear one of each saw apart. Can't visualize the plug angle offhand, tho. May be angled a bit too much to see anything conclusive.
When Tim mentioned checking through the plug hole on his SP80/81, that's the first thing I thought of as a possible way to compare the 700 and 7-10 cylinders without having to tear one of each saw apart. Can't visualize the plug angle offhand, tho. May be angled a bit too much to see anything conclusive.
Countries are fussy about country of origin and have been for 60 or 70 years so if it says USA, it was made there (unless it was made in China).
Many saws were exported from countries that had favourable duty rates with the destination country. Your 4000 was made in Canada and likely came to New Zealand for that reason. I'm kind of surprised your MAC's didn't come from Australia but I don't know when they ceased production there. The satellite plants may all have been closed by then.
R. McCulloch sold the company in 1974 to B&D.
Have a look at the label on your friends 82cc MAC when he gets it.
I recently got 7 new to me Macs, ranging from a model 73 to a 10-10?, but mostly 80-87 cc's. One of them, a Super 25, is proof of McCulloch's parts hoarding extremes. When I first got it I checked the block to ID it and it said it was a 1-43, which I scoffed at as it doesn't look even remotely like my 1-42, so I thought I'd misread it. When I looked it up and saw it was a Super 250, I double-checked the block and am now guessing that McCulloch used a 7-10 year old block on a new saw. Just guessing based off of the crappy cellphone pics, would you say I'm right? Also, Is the second saw shown a 10-10? It doesn't have any traces of lettering on the top cover so I want to make sure I'm right in my guessing. Yikes! These pics are even crappier on my computer than they were on my phone! I'll try to get better pics later tomorrow, and I'll show the full collection, I promise.
View attachment 772420View attachment 772421 View attachment 772422 View attachment 772423 View attachment 772424
View attachment 772425
I recently got 7 new to me Macs, ranging from a model 73 to a 10-10?, but mostly 80-87 cc's. One of them, a Super 25, is proof of McCulloch's parts hoarding extremes. When I first got it I checked the block to ID it and it said it was a 1-43, which I scoffed at as it doesn't look even remotely like my 1-42, so I thought I'd misread it. When I looked it up and saw it was a Super 250, I double-checked the block and am now guessing that McCulloch used a 7-10 year old block on a new saw. Just guessing based off of the crappy cellphone pics, would you say I'm right? Also, Is the second saw shown a 10-10? It doesn't have any traces of lettering on the top cover so I want to make sure I'm right in my guessing. Yikes! These pics are even crappier on my computer than they were on my phone! I'll try to get better pics later tomorrow, and I'll show the full collection, I promise.
View attachment 772420View attachment 772421 View attachment 772422 View attachment 772423 View attachment 772424
View attachment 772425
Commiefornia!!!! Thats clever and very funny!!I recently got 7 new to me Macs, ranging from a model 73 to a 10-10?, but mostly 80-87 cc's. One of them, a Super 25, is proof of McCulloch's parts hoarding extremes. When I first got it I checked the block to ID it and it said it was a 1-43, which I scoffed at as it doesn't look even remotely like my 1-42, so I thought I'd misread it. When I looked it up and saw it was a Super 250, I double-checked the block and am now guessing that McCulloch used a 7-10 year old block on a new saw. Just guessing based off of the crappy cellphone pics, would you say I'm right? Also, Is the second saw shown a 10-10? It doesn't have any traces of lettering on the top cover so I want to make sure I'm right in my guessing. Yikes! These pics are even crappier on my computer than they were on my phone! I'll try to get better pics later tomorrow, and I'll show the full collection, I promise.
View attachment 772420View attachment 772421 View attachment 772422 View attachment 772423 View attachment 772424
View attachment 772425
Enter your email address to join: