The trigger still looks too close in like on the 200T which rubs on the front side of your trigger finger and turns the skin thick and raspy if you're clocking hours up. You gotta chizel the thick skin off your trigger finger with a razor blade if you don't want a bloody great lump there all the time.
You don't get that with an XPT husqvarnas comfortable handle and trigger setup. The 201 still retains the horribly designed uncomfortable Stihl setup which dates back to the 50's. There's a token attempt at smooth edges on the casings but all in all there's nothing to get excited about from what I'm seeing in the rotatable pic though
Also the 200T raps your knuckle hard on a sharp plastic edge if you get a bit of a kickback. It fekkin hurts, I'm thinking it's a deliberate design to teach newbies a lesson on staying alert, but end of the day it's still just too cramped around the trigger, but going by eye, that 201 may have a bit more room there. Maybe. You'd have to hold it to find out.
The "15% better" nonsense about their new bumpy chizel LP chain will be a crock of bollocks, a well sharpened non-bumper semi-chizel would spank it. Guarantee it.
And the weedy 192T spring on the front handle of the 201 looks spindly and flexy and sh1tty, but having used 192T's, that skinny spring actually seemed pretty robust but the 192T is a featherweight saw. You can't say that for the 201 which is even heavier than the overweight 200T. Increasing the weight of a TH saw is a big NO NO, it's the worst possible thing Stihl could have done