spacemule
The Peanut Gallery
Care to elaborate? Do tell.Ekka said:Sort of shot yourself in the foot have you?
Care to elaborate? Do tell.Ekka said:Sort of shot yourself in the foot have you?
I agree with your opinion, I just don't think that letter would be effective. Consider that "The one in question must have and I really think their encouraged by the others down the line were their views were blocked by houses." So, now we have at least part of his audience already against him. Are they going to respond well to a preaching, condescending letter, or are they going to laugh because it's obvious he's upset?Ekka said:Perhaps us Aussies aren't as politically correct as you, substitute what ever words you like, even for the lowlife, but it's only the facts that have been mentioned. Should that constitute whining then too bad, I wouldn't give a hoot. I'd even see if the local paper would run a story. This guy moves out to acreage to enjoy his land, his way.
I'm far from mentally unstable, and quite the contrary, and yes, the tone should be of some-one determined to get to the bottom of the issue prepared to put their money where their mouth is. He is the victim. And the neighbor needs to feel the heat.
I bet it would be a totally different issue if it were a dog or cat etc that was baited, but because it's a tree that's not as serious but does involve trespassing to cause malicious damage, malicious damage furthering to hazardous and dangerous environment to the landowner who then has to alleviate the hazard at his cost.
What has it cost the land owner already? Not to mention any emotional stress suffered. These were planted trees with a specific purpose not remnant forest.
Should proceedings only lead to fine and slap on the wrist with no restitution or compensation the landowner could then follow that up with civil action for compensation ... and he'd win hands down.
One council over here took severe action against a group of unit holders in a complex that was overlooking the bay. They posted huge placards and newspaper ads with rewards to get the people who poisoned a heap of trees for view of the bay ... cut a long story short they erected a huge billboard painted out with murals totally screening out the view of the bay for those units, cost them over $50,000 and although no-one was prosecuted due to lack of evidence they considered justice served to the culprits.
Perhaps if the neighbor had approached genesutton with his problems something could have transpired, but the way this neighbor has taken upon himself to do as he pleases with some-one else's property goes a lot deeper than just poisoning trees.
I personally had issues with my neighbors tree, invited them over for a BBQ, we had a chat about the problems and they agreed to cut it down which I did for no charge ... that's the way it should go. If they didn't agree to cut it down I would have tried to prune, if they flat out dug in and wouldn't touch it I'd have to search for other options.
And I'm allowed my opinion, if you don't like it too bad.
Mike Maas said:I can see why the neighbor wouldn't want those trees!
Enter your email address to join: