OK, I checked this again.
I am comfortable that the clutch housing is seating fully towards the engine. The gap at the end of the crankshaft looks the same to me, for the Stihl, or the Forester, when pushed onto the crankshaft, with the grooves lined up with the oil-pump spring.
I took some measurements of the overall height of each unit, if you lay them on the ground, and measure down through the hole. That was 1.170" for the Forester, 1.245" for the Stihl. But that really doesn't tell you much, because they don't bottom out on the backs of their housings, that height doesn't determine their location relative to the bar. It is of interest, however, that the Forester would presumably have less engagement with the oil-pump's spring, since it doesn't extend as far back towards the engine.
The attached picture is the clearest illustration of the problem that I could manage quickly. I used a bar as a straightedge, and aligned each sprocket against the bar. This is effectively how they mount in the saw, as their sprocket faces would be up against the E-clip at the end of the crankshaft. So their location would be determined by this surface, not the other end, by the clutch and oil-pump spring.
Note, from the red line that I added, how the center of the chain groove in the Forester is shifted further out from the saw (or up, in this picture) than the wear-marks in the Stihl sprocket. This is, I believe, why the chain has to bend away from the saw, when it comes out of the bar, to line up with the Forester's sprocket groove.
The Forester clutch housing is marked with the same part number, W3/8LZ7C, that the box label shows. That label lists 029, etc. So I believe I received the correct parts. They simply don't fit properly. If I'm mis-reading this, please tell me, but it seems to me that the Forester unit was not designed/made correctly.