agree yours looks cleaner. I wonder if yours was a Mahle? mine also has a little rough casting inside some of the ports. much better than the AM cylinder though. I am planning to chamfer all edges in the morning with some emery cloth. the chamfers aren't sharp, but they could be better. I may or may not take some time and smooth out the small casting marks in the ports. and maybe polish the exhaust port a little. I understand it is desirable to have a little roughness in the intake. I do have a Foredom flex shaft, burrs and sanding drums but I have little knowledge of porting so not going in that direction.Good pictures and thanks for measuring things too. Port shapes, and just the piston windows are going to effect flow.
Here are some pics from an OEM 036 cyl I saved from a straight gas episode (free saw). It was ugly to start with (see piston), but cleaned up nice. I imagine this cylinder is from 1995-1996? I wish I'd saved more pictures
It looks like the chamfers on the ports are a little cleaner than your NOS. I'd not worked on them. I did clean up and match the ex outlet to muffler.
View attachment 998677View attachment 998678View attachment 998679View attachment 998680View attachment 998681View attachment 998683View attachment 998687
I had read previously that the Mahle cylinders were cleaner castings than the KS but that the KS cylinders were made of a better-quality aluminum alloy. the consensus was that as far as power and torque they performed the same.