Between 3/8 and 3/8 picco or Low Pro?
Is there a measureable difference in pitch? Cutter height and width?
Is there a measureable difference in pitch? Cutter height and width?
PEST said:Are you asking for dimensionsal difference performance or what?
Smaller (shorter/less tall) pitch .365(pico)versus .375(3/8) less mass and less aggressive for smaller saws.
Cut4fun said:How about a 5/32 cutter for 3/8 LP or picco and a 7/32 cutter for 3/8. Plus the spacing on the drive links, .365 and .375.
Yep, it must be....Cut4fun said:You are correct, I just measured the 2 chains and they were the same distance between drive links.
Must just be a optical illusion playing on my mind.
Lakeside53 said:Nope... The bar tip is different as is the sprocket.
I have. The smaller drive link just dont fit the rim as well. Plus I only did it for a short period of time, when i didnt have a shorter bar, for a bigger saw. I was running the 3/8LP bar with reg 3/8 rim.CaseyForrest said:So, one can use 3/8 picco on a regular 3/8 bar and rim?
Lakeside53 said:I'd need to drag my flu-ridden ass down to the cold garage and mess around to give you a better informed answer, but from memory the standard bar tip rides the small picco tangs out of the bar. It's not just the cutters that are smaller. Same for the sprocket geometry. Stihl has Picco bars in the 3003 mount, but doesn't sell them in the USA - Logosol does though. Stihl doesn't want the liability of guys putting picco on their MS660 and "overpowering" the chains. Even the MS250 has .325 for this reason... (the 210 has Picco).
Enter your email address to join: