Pinhead saw comparisons

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
The wife was gonna parade around like in a boxing match in a bikini with the big numbers of the saws on cards, lmfao. Twas a little cold for that though, maybe the next one eh? :hmm3grin2orange: :cheers:

BOINGGGG!!!!!!!!!

You'll get some rep points for that!


P.S.....Cold air does have its advantages:cheers:
 
Schwwiinngg

The wife was gonna parade around like in a boxing match in a bikini with the big numbers of the saws on cards, lmfao. Twas a little cold for that though, maybe the next one eh? :hmm3grin2orange: :cheers:

BOINGGGG!!!!!!!!!

You'll definitely boost your Google hits and your AS rep points with that one. :cheers:

BRING IT :hmm3grin2orange:
 
Will the next famed post be about pinheads with big saws and little bars?:deadhorse:

OOOOH OHHH I want to read that one!!!!!

Got me laughing like a little schoolgirl now!

:hmm3grin2orange:
 
Odd saw/bar matching

Will the next famed post be about pinheads with big saws and little bars?

:hmm3grin2orange:

Hey, there was that post a while back with the photo of a little Echo top handle with a monster 48" bar on it. Now, THAT was funny. Creative too. So the inverse might be just as funny... a 660 with an 8" bar or something.
 
... For example I know from experience that burying a 36 inch bar will have the 7900 come out short as compared to my 395 (or 066). But timing the 7900 in a cut in smaller wood is just more information, even though not all the information.

That is about what I tried to say, but in a more general way.......:greenchainsaw:
 
I can see how comparing a fresh, properly tuned and prepped modern machine against a "barn find" saw of questionable history, wear and tune would be meaningless relative to model-to-model comparisons, but as a saw-to saw comparison, it's totally a valid test. Wouldn't prove much beyond this particular machine versus that particular machine, but it IS valid to that irrelavent question.

Kind of like comparing Faith Hill to Roseann Barr. It shows that this particular blonde is more attractive to that particular brunette, but not that all blondes are more attractive to all brunettes.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top