Being the Sachs Dolmar freak that I am,
There seems to be a little more to the relationship between Beaird Poulan and Sachs Dolmar than just some re-labled saws between the two.
I see the influence on both saws, whether it came from Beaird Poulan or Sachs Dolmar I dunno.
So next time Mark grips about the "over engineered German saws", me thinks he needs to take a closer look at his green babies.
Sorry Mo, I have been looking close at all this for a long, long time. Me thinks you need to get off my back.
There was a relationship between SD and BP to relabel some saws for each other that is fact. Poulan at the time was behind in bigger saw development and SD needed help in there small saw department.
Seems it was a benificial relationship for both, and thats a good thing. As for any other relationship between them? I'm all ears, please enlighten us with some facts please. I see no other influence between the two of them. None, nada, zip other then the fact they both have a handle on the back and a bar on the front.
Again, please tell me why you say that! What parts did they share? Thats right none, what designs did they share? Thats right none.
Personally, looking at the time frame from there arrangment, I think SD should have kept selling the relabeled Poulan saws as the small saws they produced for themselves after that, fell short in alot of areas from the Poulan saws. Yes I have had my hands in the small SD saws to make that statement.
In fact one I had I gave away, just couldnt see keeping it when I had better ones here, but thats not saying a SD 105 is bad at all.