Like I said, I trust independant test results from DLG/KWF a lot more than you.........
Sooooo. Except the truth. LOL.
Proof is in the Pic and the USERS HANDS, not in the book.
I am done proving beyond a doubt you were once wrong again with your biased book specs. NUFF SAID, I am done, As porky pig would say, thats all folks! proof is there.
Excellent Post
The people that are always inquiring on here on which models to buy aren't using a saw to make a living. There priorities are and should be completely different. A Homeowner's saw is more of an investment then a disposable tool like it is in your line of work. In 10 years, you really don't care if there is still a part available or a person locally that can work on it because you have already bought a saw to replace it. A homeowner needs that sense of insurance a lot more imo. Eventhough a 60cc saw isn't a good fit for you, I think they are a good fit for a homeowner trying to rely on one saw.
Really, I shouldn't answer your posts at all, says a number of members here
I wonder who they are? I get a few PMs everyday about your [spec] posts in every thread, and the dislike thereof. Overall it would seem that most members would like for you to stick to posts about the 353, 361 and the 372, as you actually own these models, and leave your info out of the thousands of other posts about saws that you don't own.
everyone who Pms me speaks of the rule that says: "if you don't own it and have used it extensively, you are not permitted to give opinions about it at arboristsite." and the "outcry" gets a little louder everyday.
no one can know everything about every saw made, past and present. imo, that is what bothers most members. for example, I do not own a jonsered, and only one husky. you do not see me personally on threads discussing those saws. I get the idea that most guys wish you would be as considerate. Look at lakeside and thall; you don't see them talking about saws other than those they know (stihl and a few they might own) imo, this helps bolster the opinion members have about them. they know what they know, and don't BS when they don't.
All I am asking you Mr Troll, is to see other's view of this. Perhaps we can meet somewhere around the middle?
-Ralph
BTW Mr Troll, I personally don't care what you post as long as it doesn't break the rules and cause me more work here than I already do
Tried to rep that! but shooting blanks again for you.
.... All I am asking you Mr Troll, is to see other's view of this. Perhaps we can meet somewhere around the middle?
-Ralph
The point you (and some others) seem to have lost, is that the info I post is usually not from any spec sheet, unless someone ask explicitly for that, but aggregated info from several sources.....
..but I take your point anyway - some people just want "hands-on" info, which sorry to say often is based on one set of cutting attachment, in one size and type of wood, unless it is just an opinion.
I am by no means a "veteran" of this site, or a professional woodcutter, lumberjack or.... etc. I don't make a lot of posts, mainly because I don' t have the knowledge to offer anything of great value that often. I see posts from the "troll" in a lot of threads and it sure seems that he manages to help a large number of members here out with information that these particular members weren't able to find on the their own. A majority of what he states I too have already found on my own and am aware of, he is kind enough to take the time and energy to give that info out....
Lay off the Trolls :deadhorse:
no one is picking on the troll. only a conversation. remember getting jumped for my posts earlier this week. everyone who posts on a public forum is subject to public review.......
-Ralph
10-4
Enter your email address to join: