Ummmm i still kinda like high leverage pull line in direction of gunned face to force hinge stronger in opposite and equal reaction gives best control in good wood. i like to apply that with a rotaional force of line going around spar or over the top.
Liking such force too in rigging; even though a linear force to rig across etc., applying it with some torqued rotation. Though in rigging horizontals, you don't have the inherent pressure on the hinge of tree pushing down, and tension has to supply force for all such support alone; unless tension angle is back into the hinge itself with a tight line.
Similarily to torqued motion, one can push a door open with a straight of hand movement only, or push as hand also rolls into the door, bringing the distance of the turn in the hand as a compounding action to the straight arm movement. If spin in hand comes before or after door contact instead; force is not captured into opening the door i think. But if forward motion and hand spin contact door, both work in unison, and less effort is needed; or the same effort yields more i think; the distance avalable is used more strategically.
i think tree must fall to balance of pushes and pulls, and a tapered hinge is a force multiplier. The more line pull direction is not in line with gunned apex of face, but counters sidelean more directly/ linearally; the hinge is unloaded from that task. But the more direction is to apex of face, the balance must come from the hinge, so the line pull msut go through this multiplier to adjust balance of sidelean. More of an indirect, arched effort to adjsut the sidelean.
In this mechanichs, indirect is good, as long as that longer path can be concentrated into the work, not just extra movement wasted without target. Arching/spinning gives this in the same amount of available distance as just a linear 'attack'.
:alien: :alien:
Liking such force too in rigging; even though a linear force to rig across etc., applying it with some torqued rotation. Though in rigging horizontals, you don't have the inherent pressure on the hinge of tree pushing down, and tension has to supply force for all such support alone; unless tension angle is back into the hinge itself with a tight line.
Similarily to torqued motion, one can push a door open with a straight of hand movement only, or push as hand also rolls into the door, bringing the distance of the turn in the hand as a compounding action to the straight arm movement. If spin in hand comes before or after door contact instead; force is not captured into opening the door i think. But if forward motion and hand spin contact door, both work in unison, and less effort is needed; or the same effort yields more i think; the distance avalable is used more strategically.
i think tree must fall to balance of pushes and pulls, and a tapered hinge is a force multiplier. The more line pull direction is not in line with gunned apex of face, but counters sidelean more directly/ linearally; the hinge is unloaded from that task. But the more direction is to apex of face, the balance must come from the hinge, so the line pull msut go through this multiplier to adjust balance of sidelean. More of an indirect, arched effort to adjsut the sidelean.
In this mechanichs, indirect is good, as long as that longer path can be concentrated into the work, not just extra movement wasted without target. Arching/spinning gives this in the same amount of available distance as just a linear 'attack'.
:alien: :alien:
