sredlin
ArboristSite Operative
I think full = one, (1)". No one needs to specify "full cord"
I think full = one, (1)". No one needs to specify "full cord"
When you ordered the wood did you or the dealer specify FULL cords of firewood? I think one of the problems that people have when buying firewood is the confusion of face cords, full cords, and pulp cords of wood. If neither of you specified full cord I wonder if you have any recourse.
When you ordered the wood did you or the dealer specify FULL cords of firewood? I think one of the problems that people have when buying firewood is the confusion of face cords, full cords, and pulp cords of wood. If neither of you specified full cord I wonder if you have any recourse.
NO ONE stacks their wood in a basket weave configuration. Plus if you ever order firewood by the face cord, be sure to specify the length of the wood. If the dealer is selling 16 inch lengths you are getting a lot less wood than from someone who cuts it at 18 to 24 inches!
Good luck!
Jim
here si something weird. I can take 128 cubic feet of split, cut to length firewood, restack it, and make 108 cubic feet, or 140 cubic feet.
How? I sold to an old Czech dude who picked the pile and found the perfect piece, then threw out all the short stuff. Further, he stacked it one row deep, 6 feet tall, then as long as it would go down a fence, and whittled me by saying the AVERAGE length of my sticks were 15 inches, not 16 inches.
Now I could take that same "cord of wood", go 2 feet tall, 3 rows deep, stack normally, and I could make it into 140 cubic feet.
the more "edges" around the wood, the more air. It really becomes significant fi you sell someone 5 cords of wood.
A cord of wood is defined to be the amount of wood that can be neatly stacked into an area defined by 4x4x8. In our state, a Cord is NOT 128 cubic feet of wood.
A cord of wood is defined to be the amount of wood that can be neatly stacked into an area defined by 4x4x8. In our state, a Cord is NOT 128 cubic feet of wood.
A cord is a cord. 128 cubic feet. It's the only legally defined unit of measure for firewood that uses the word, "cord".
All the rest is pure made up crap. No legal standing, no legal validity. Meaningless in a court. What isn't defined cannot be enforced.
Since a cord means only one thing, there is no need to specify a "full cord", any more than there's a need to specify a full gallon, or a full mile, or a full pint, or any other legally defined unit of measure.
It's either a cord or it isn't.
EXACTLY!Face cords, ricks, racks, and truckloads are not units of measure.
Cords, pounds, cubic feet, and fractions or multiples (1/2 cord, 2000lbs, 100cubic feet, etc.) of each are units of measure.
here si something weird. I can take 128 cubic feet of split, cut to length firewood, restack it, and make 108 cubic feet, or 140 cubic feet.
How? I sold to an old Czech dude who picked the pile and found the perfect piece, then threw out all the short stuff. Further, he stacked it one row deep, 6 feet tall, then as long as it would go down a fence, and whittled me by saying the AVERAGE length of my sticks were 15 inches, not 16 inches.
Now I could take that same "cord of wood", go 2 feet tall, 3 rows deep, stack normally, and I could make it into 140 cubic feet.
the more "edges" around the wood, the more air. It really becomes significant fi you sell someone 5 cords of wood.
A cord of wood is defined to be the amount of wood that can be neatly stacked into an area defined by 4x4x8. In our state, a Cord is NOT 128 cubic feet of wood.
here si something weird. I can take 128 cubic feet of split, cut to length firewood, restack it, and make 108 cubic feet, or 140 cubic feet.
How? I sold to an old Czech dude who picked the pile and found the perfect piece, then threw out all the short stuff. Further, he stacked it one row deep, 6 feet tall, then as long as it would go down a fence, and whittled me by saying the AVERAGE length of my sticks were 15 inches, not 16 inches.
Now I could take that same "cord of wood", go 2 feet tall, 3 rows deep, stack normally, and I could make it into 140 cubic feet.
the more "edges" around the wood, the more air. It really becomes significant fi you sell someone 5 cords of wood.
A cord of wood is defined to be the amount of wood that can be neatly stacked into an area defined by 4x4x8. In our state, a Cord is NOT 128 cubic feet of wood.
I think I would have had him pack it in after the second or third piece. I hate restacking and would have charged accordingly.
Gotta hand it to the oldtimers though, they have all the time in the world to spend trying to save a buck. Even at someone elses expence.
Says McCall, Idaho under your username...
http://www3.idaho.gov/cgi-bin/newidst?sctid=710020030.K
71-230. "BARREL," "TON" AND "CORD" DEFINED. ... The term "cord" when used in connection with wood intended for fuel purposes shall mean the amount of wood that is contained in a space of one hundred twenty-eight (128) cubic feet when the wood is ranked and well stowed.
I think you explained it well.
I remember watching a tv show/movie where a teacher fills a glass with loose stone to the top and the class agrees that the glass is "full". He then pours in sand that fills the gaps between the stones. The class agrees again that the glass is "full". He then pours in water until the glass is fulll. This time it really is full.
Same sort of deal with a cord of wood. There will always be air space. Very difficult to measure a cord unless the pieces are roughly the same length. If you get it close to plus/minus 5% of 128 cubic feet I think its close enough to call a cord.
So, if the pieces are not all exactly the same length, did you short the customer?