When you are above a three phase on a skinny tree tree that leans close to it, you may wish you had spurs on. But you have never done powerline work, so you really have no clue, maybe a few inklings, but it takes ten inklings to make a clue.
Thank you all for responding, but what I really asked was, according to your understanding of ISA rules, are these trees powerline trees because they are by a powerline, or residential trees because they are front of a residence?
I haven't done powerline work either, but I've met a lineman once.
It is my opinion, irregardless of what ISA or ANSI says, if the tree is near the powerline, and the power company is paying for the prune then spike (assuming it is faster and safer than spurless). As I stated in another thread (that probably initiated this one), the effect of the spikes is probably less than the hard pruning done to achieve powerline clearance. And yes, I know you make proper cuts, but you are taking more from the tree than would be necessary for proper tree growth.
I am often at a customers house, and they are complaining about how the power company butchered the tree. Once I talk to them about power reliability, clearance standards in the contract, pruning cuts, when branches are taken back to the stem etc, they usually look at the tree in a new light. Usually still don't like the look of the tree, but respect the need for the work to be done.
For those who feel that no tree can be spiked during a prune, I'm reminded of a Monty Python classic "Every sperm is sacred". There are too many variables in this business to make blanket statements without expecting there to be exceptions. It may be different if you are an owner with more control, but as an employee running a truck, you may not have access to necessary equipment/gear and bypassing a job is not an option. For example, inspect an old topping cut in a 140' Douglas fir. First usable branch is 80' and you have no Big Shot. Bypassing the job is not an option, so you do what you have to do.
Last edited: