Give it a rest Brett.That's ironic.
"The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) said there have been at least four serious injuries and one death to users of these log splitters. The injuries involved the loss of arms, legs or fingers. The CPSC originally learned of this unsafe product from a consumer complaint. "
Yet they still allow the sale of "vaccines" that have killed many more and injured way more.
The 2in1 doesn't work with skip. You probably know that,.... Unlike Wranglerstar.It only sat there for its first day in my ownership lol. 2-in-1 is the best thing since sliced bread. Noone around here wants anything besides lodgepole, and i dont burn wood, we have a pellet stove. Ironic.
The Stihl trousers you linked are class 1 rated (will stop a chain running at 20 m/s).: I think the husky ones are the same as mine, which are class of 2 rated, will stop as chain running at 24 m/s. I imagine a ms400 has a fairly high chain speed, even with a25" bar. I'd want class 2. You can get class 3 (28 m/s) but they cost a lot more and will find them warmer I guess.Chainsaw pants is all I use, I have 4 pair .
Some are better than others for comfort .
For the money I'm happy with these
https://en.stihl.ca/STIHL-Products/...s/2117104-74548/FUNCTION-Universal-Pants.aspxThese may fit a little nicer but the inner lining leaves you with a constant sweaty/clammy feeling
https://www.husqvarna.com/ca-en/acc...ing/functional-protective-pant-bnq/582053001/Yes , I have read 20 pages back.
I hope Cowboy Sr. makes a speedy recovery !
Hemlock is very rot resistant , good for ground contact .
I may buy another Montana van if it's as good as claimed lol
In the US, the rating is ‘pass or fail’. We don’t have the same class ratings that the EU (and maybe Canadian?) standards have. Some manufacturers will describe theirs as ‘6-layer’ or ‘9-layer’ but not by chain speed. And I don’t know if chain speed is as important as torque (e.g. a 40cc saw vs a 70cc saw running at the same ‘speed’).The Stihl trousers you linked are class 1 rated (will stop a chain running at 20 m/s).: . . .
I believe in other countries climbers are also required to wear them, but not here iirc.In the US, the rating is ‘pass or fail’. We don’t have the same class ratings that the EU (and maybe Canadian?) standards have. Some manufacturers will describe theirs as ‘6-layer’ or ‘9-layer’ but not by chain speed. And I don’t know if chain speed is as important as torque (e.g. a 40cc saw vs a 70cc saw running at the same ‘speed’).
No.Isn't that also a problem with the battery/ electric saws.
I had no idea, I do know most battery/electric tools have gobs of torque, but at a lower rpm many times. I've never seen those videos, but yesterday I saw one where a guy was running a 60cc or larger(I'd guess) stihl and cut into his chaps and stalled it out. Then he took the chaps off or pulled them down, he had shorts on, only cut him a little . All for science and stuff lol.No.
Chaps are not ‘rated’ for battery or electric chainsaws because the test requires a gasoline powered saw. But root around YouTube and look at all the ‘tests’ of battery chainsaws and chaps.
Rumors are funny: the guys who assume that battery powered saws won’t cut through warm butter are certain that they will tear through chaps designed to stop a 60cc saw!
Yeah i saw that. Just gotta be careful and make sure that bar aint bent.CPSC warning on Bark Buster type screw splitters:
https://www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/1991/s...g-splitters-safety-commission-warns-consumers
Philbert
Thanks man! And yeah the 2 in 1 isint the best for skip, just gotta watch you dont get the rakers to low with it.The 2in1 doesn't work with skip. You probably know that,.... Unlike Wranglerstar.
The Stihl trousers you linked are class 1 rated (will stop a chain running at 20 m/s).: I think the husky ones are the same as mine, which are class of 2 rated, will stop as chain running at 24 m/s. I imagine a ms400 has a fairly high chain speed, even with a25" bar. I'd want class 2. You can get class 3 (28 m/s) but they cost a lot more and will find them warmer I guess.
Boots, wear decent protective boots. Use of safety glasses, they are cheap, to eyes aren't. I never used then to cut and relied upon the face shield on my helmet then I got educated by the gents here. Face shields protect faces, not eyes.
I'm very impressed by such and industrious young man as the king, very impressed!
My grandpa bought one of the “big” dewalt ones with the 16” bar. I dont really think its any faster or lighter than our husky 445. Of course that saw is really fast for what it is.I had no idea, I do know most battery/electric tools have gobs of torque, but at a lower rpm many times. I've never seen those videos, but yesterday I saw one where a guy was running a 60cc or larger(I'd guess) stihl and cut into his chaps and stalled it out. Then he took the chaps off or pulled them down, he had shorts on, only cut him a little . All for science and stuff lol.
Well at least I didn't believe they wouldn't cut thru warm butter lol.
One day I'll own one, just not today, well most likely, but the night is young . I almost bought one about a month ago, but it was one of the smaller rear handled stihls, I'd want one of the larger rear or top handles. I can see a few nice advantages of having one, but most those advantages aren't the best for me. If dewalt made a good one I might go for that since I already have their tools, but it's a big jump for me with the gas saws I already have.
We had one and used it for years till the chain snapped. It worked pretty good as long as you didn’t put too short of a piece of wood in it.You guys ever use them bark buster log splitters? Kinda scary when they are cranked up but they work good.
I've been tempted many times, but each time I read the reviews on the dewalt versions it seems they are still working thru problems.My grandpa bought one of the “big” dewalt ones with the 16” bar. I dont really think its any faster or lighter than our husky 445. Of course that saw is really fast for what it is.
Breakfast is served!!!My morning walk to the OWB:
View attachment 975198
So I’m not disagreeing that these are dangerous… But I’m curious as to the injury rate compared to a hydraulic splitter?CPSC warning on Bark Buster type screw splitters:
https://www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/1991/s...g-splitters-safety-commission-warns-consumers
Philbert
To compare injury rate between the two types is probably difficult because there are countless hydraulic splitters out there, but only a limited number of the augur type.So I’m not disagreeing that these are dangerous… But I’m curious as to the injury rate compared to a hydraulic splitter?
The difference is the potential for injury, not the amount of injuries. There is no dead man or momentary switch to stop it in the event of entanglement.So I’m not disagreeing that these are dangerous… But I’m curious as to the injury rate compared to a hydraulic splitter?
I think that's why the augur splitters give me the heebie-jeebies. Years of operating combines, with their numerous whipping chains, sprockets, belts, etc., and balers, etc. with pto shafts--all it takes is a moment of inattention to get a sleeve caught or some such. The casualty list/rate is beyond comprehension.There are many differences but it's almost like getting caught in a pto. Everyone knows the hazards yet injuries still happen....
I can't tell you how many guards I've seen removed because "they were in the way"