The 400 is also a good choice ... and FS would know!
Nice saw! If you do lots of cutting and have the saws set up for particular jobs then I can understand but otherwise that list of saws looks to have some overlap. Cowboy needs a 400 Vs 460 detailed reviewSpeaking of the MS400...
View attachment 979903
My Stihl dealer was a man of his word and called me when one came in. I traded the MS362 in. Hasn't been run yet. Both tanks are dry. Can't wait!
I need to sell my 254xp now. I will have a 180, 026, 400, 460 and 650. That should do. I might whittle the collection down more. Need...to...resist...CAD!
Overlap? No overlap. It's called being prepared!Nice saw! If you do lots of cutting and have the saws set up for particular jobs then I can understand but otherwise that list of saws looks to have some overlap. Cowboy needs a 400 Vs 460 detailed review
I have accepted that i have CAD and i have embraced it.All this talk of convincing cowboy to buy a 400 may backfire in my face and end up sending me to the tyre shop.
I also have a gap problem 35cc - 50cc - 79cc - 92cc.
I see a gap between 50cc and 79cc. I like the 15cc between saws rule of thumb. The Ms400 sits nicely in that gap at 66cc.
But it would also be nice to have a Ms462, if I end with one of them I’ll admit I have Cad.
You've been around here looking enough to know I was a big fan of small saws, loved my little ms180. Wouldn't win any races but it was cheap, reliable, capable and light. I still am a fan of such saws BUT after buying the Makita ea4300 I have amended my views slightly. I now think there is a certain weight/size below which lighter is little benefit. Ms180, 31cc, 4300, 43cc and proportionally more powerful and heavier, BUT still below the cut off weight where you basically don't notice it, the saw is small and can be used all day. My guess is that this changes somewhere around 45-55cc, that's not too say a bigger saw can't be used, but you'll notice the difference and feel the benefit if you go lighter.All this talk of convincing cowboy to buy a 400 may backfire in my face and end up sending me to the tyre shop.
I also have a gap problem 35cc - 50cc - 79cc - 92cc.
I see a gap between 50cc and 79cc. I like the 15cc between saws rule of thumb. The Ms400 sits nicely in that gap at 66cc.
But it would also be nice to have a Ms462, if I end with one of them I’ll admit I have Cad.
Wait a second, the 7910(or the newest rendition the makita 7900prz) is less than a half a pound more than your 365xt, and will weight the same as yours if you mod the muffler and remove all the innards . The earlier dollar 7900 is lighter out of the box and it comes with a nice set up large dogs unlike the 365xt. I do like the smaller dogs on a stock 365/372 as I can get more usable length out of a 20" or 24" bar.You've been around here looking enough to know I was a big fan of small saws, loved my little ms180. Wouldn't win any races but it was cheap, reliable, capable and light. I still am a fan of such saws BUT after buying the Makita ea4300 I have amended my views slightly. I now think there is a certain weight/size below which lighter is little benefit. Ms180, 31cc, 4300, 43cc and proportionally more powerful and heavier, BUT still below the cut off weight where you basically don't notice it, the saw is small and can be used all day. My guess is that this changes somewhere around 45-55cc, that's not too say a bigger saw can't be used, but you'll notice the difference and feel the benefit if you go lighter.
So I'm interested to know, does your 50cc saw feel heavier than the 35, or is it just 'light'?
79cc.... Dolmakita 7910 I assume.. bit of a boat anchor.... Yes you need a lighter medium duty saw
My small saw is a rear handle Ms201, the next size up is the mk1 550xp.You've been around here looking enough to know I was a big fan of small saws, loved my little ms180. Wouldn't win any races but it was cheap, reliable, capable and light. I still am a fan of such saws BUT after buying the Makita ea4300 I have amended my views slightly. I now think there is a certain weight/size below which lighter is little benefit. Ms180, 31cc, 4300, 43cc and proportionally more powerful and heavier, BUT still below the cut off weight where you basically don't notice it, the saw is small and can be used all day. My guess is that this changes somewhere around 45-55cc, that's not too say a bigger saw can't be used, but you'll notice the difference and feel the benefit if you go lighter.
So I'm interested to know, does your 50cc saw feel heavier than the 35, or is it just 'light'?
79cc.... Dolmakita 7910 I assume.. bit of a boat anchor.... Yes you need a lighter medium duty saw
Progress on and off today with running kids around. And I won't get much done next week.
View attachment 980082View attachment 980083View attachment 980084View attachment 980085View attachment 980086View attachment 980087View attachment 980088View attachment 980089View attachment 980090View attachment 980091
I'd like to have a 400 or 462.That is the beauty of the new 400/462 saws, great power to weight.
For example, the 462 has the weight of most 60 cc saws, the size of a 70 cc saw and the power of a 77-79 cc saw (and they usually dyno over their stated 6 Hp).
Just real hard not to like them for an all around saw (if you can afford it). The price is the only downside, so you have to look at it as a long term investment.
I still have my 10 mm 044 purchased new in 12/92, and it still runs strong!
Ran my 201 this evening.My small saw is a rear handle Ms201, the next size up is the mk1 550xp.
The 201 feels significantly lighter but interestingly its almost the same size as the 550.
I do 3 types of wood scrounging.
1) Collect a trailer load from my sisters property 440km from Sydney each time I go there. My trailer only holds half a cord. I take the 550 and 7900 for that and work my way through fallen trees. Half a cord is not that much so I don’t realy get worn out. The 550 serves the function of small saw well for this. I’ve never even bothered taking the 201.
2) State forest with 2 other buddies. They take their trailers I do all the cutting, around 2 cord per trip. The MMWS 661 does all the bucking 28” bar and the 7900 does all the noodling 20” bar. A Ms400 with a 18” bar would be ideal for noodling.
3) large rounds delivered to my door by my local tree service guy. Anything I can’t split gets noodled by the 7900.
A Ms400 would be better for noodling as the logs are cut short.
The Ms201 so far has pretty much only been used for dicing up splits which don’t fit in the fire box.
None the less I’m 44 now but I’m sure I will appreciate the weight of the Ms201 in a few decades from now So I’ll hang onto it for now.
Good idea!!! Get a fresh fix each day that way!!!Well if you're going to have a week off, at least you gave us a good set to go on with. @bob kern is going to ration himself to one pic per day
15cc spread between saws? Seems like quite a spread, I’m thinking 1 or 2cc lol.All this talk of convincing cowboy to buy a 400 may backfire in my face and end up sending me to the tyre shop.
I also have a gap problem 35cc - 50cc - 79cc - 92cc.
I see a gap between 50cc and 79cc. I like the 15cc between saws rule of thumb. The Ms400 sits nicely in that gap at 66cc.
But it would also be nice to have a Ms462, if I end with one of them I’ll admit I have Cad.
Enter your email address to join: