Hey Dennis, parts overnight is probably better than alot of other options, but it`s not the same as walking in and having minor repairs, not maintenance items, done on the spot for a good customer. I know from our conversations that you are neck deep in Jonsered and Husky stuff, and probably because it helps you on a daily basis with the professional market you`re in. If you can really get the 651s that easily, send me 10 ASAP, I`ll get them to the local dealers so they know what they look like, lol. I`m really not picking on you Dennis, or Tony, or anyone else in this matter, I`d really like to see another high quality brand or two of saw hit the market in a competitive way. There`s lots I don`t know, but it seems to me that if Solo, or any other manufacturer wants to recognized as a viable contender, they have to spend some corporate dollars to get the retailers set up right with inventory, both parts and equipment, and national advertising co-ops as a minimum, and although it doesn`t apply to you guys because you have shops, no ordering saws as you need them with nothing in the show room. It used to be that I knew of a half dozen Husky dealers and 3 or 4 Jonsered dealers who sold out of their garages. These guys were either tree services or loggers and they would give you some decent prices but absolutely no service. They were in effect the predecessors to the internet sellers, and they also gave the brands a few black eyes when something went wrong or somebody needed a repair and their saw went to a bonafide dealer who didn`t give it high priority because he didn`t sell it. These companies also should consider hitting the market with prices that are somewhat lower than actual market prices for a comparable Husky or Stihl. Nobody is really buying that "German Engineering" bs anymore. Anybody with half a brain knows that the Germans have no more scrupples than anyone else when it comes to making a buck, and that they also practice "value engineering". Let`s face it, Solo, or Dolmar, stand to be the biggest winners if their products get to be very popular, so let`s see the owners pony up some of their cash to get this show on the road, they should not sit back on their haunches and wait for the independent dealers to make them wealthy. BTW, somtimes "privately owned" or "family owned" means nothing more than the company is not viable enough for a stock offering and that the current owners archaic way of doing business would not be allowed to persist. Not that this is necessarily the case with either of these two companies, but I don`t know enough about them to say it isn`t. OK, that`s the cue for somebody to step forward and say they know all about them and I`m wrong, but that doesn`t make it true. Let`s see some filings with taxing authorities or balance sheets to back it up. Just kidding, I don`t really care that much, lol. Like I said, I`m not intentionally picking on anybody and I think it`s great for Tony to be part of this, we are talking about quality products and the plan that seesaw spoke of sounds reasonable, I`d just like to see the company do something more substantial to make their name in the market than to just let dealers throw up a tin with minimal inventory. Russ