Four-way wedge design:
The first photo shows a pretty standard design. The splits end up one of three places... stuck on or under the wedge, on the out feed table, or on the ground.
The second and third photo show a modification, a shelf design. The splits do get trapped below the four-way, but can be un-trapped by raising the four-way after splitting and the pieces pulled forward with a pulp hook to re-split if need be. The splits above the four-way are within reach of the operator without the operator having to move to the out feed table to retrieve huge splits. The lower split can be re-split on the single wedge while the two top split remain where they are, sitting nicely on top of the four-way, or the two top splits can be slid to the beam and log lift with a pulp hook and re-split with the four-way. It becomes very rhythmic and efficient without extra foot steps back and forth or lifting/carrying.
Almost every name brand splitter uses the narrow wing four-way design. I'm just not sure why...
The first photo shows a pretty standard design. The splits end up one of three places... stuck on or under the wedge, on the out feed table, or on the ground.
The second and third photo show a modification, a shelf design. The splits do get trapped below the four-way, but can be un-trapped by raising the four-way after splitting and the pieces pulled forward with a pulp hook to re-split if need be. The splits above the four-way are within reach of the operator without the operator having to move to the out feed table to retrieve huge splits. The lower split can be re-split on the single wedge while the two top split remain where they are, sitting nicely on top of the four-way, or the two top splits can be slid to the beam and log lift with a pulp hook and re-split with the four-way. It becomes very rhythmic and efficient without extra foot steps back and forth or lifting/carrying.
Almost every name brand splitter uses the narrow wing four-way design. I'm just not sure why...