treeslayer2003
Addicted to ArboristSite
in other words, people accept crap, so crap is what they get................yea, that makes sense.
in other words, people accept crap, so crap is what they get................yea, that makes sense.
I'd like to receive and attempt to mill 1/10,000,000th of the high quality timber gone in USFS prescribed burns in one year. You could build a city.
High quality timber gone in USFS prescribed burns? Not as a rule. Darn seldom as a matter of fact. Maybe you could cite some specific examples? There are several people on here who are very knowledgeable about prescribed burns. They'd probably be interested in your facts. If you have any.
There's often quite a bit of USFS timber that doesn't get harvested after a forest fire. Have you confused prescribed burns with wildfires?
Yup. But I'll take 1/10,000th of it then. Thanks for taking me off ignore old chum.
I took you off IGNORE long enough to see that you're still as much of a fatuous ignoramus as you've always been. I thought that maybe, just once, you would post something in the F&L section that had some useful content or even a smidgen of helpful information. I should have known better.
Back on IGNORE for you.
High quality timber gone in USFS prescribed burns? Not as a rule. Darn seldom as a matter of fact. Maybe you could cite some specific examples? There are several people on here who are very knowledgeable about prescribed burns. They'd probably be interested in your facts. If you have any.
There's often quite a bit of USFS timber that doesn't get harvested after a forest fire. Have you confused prescribed burns with wildfires?
There are several people on here who are very knowledgeable about prescribed burns.
He's blah blah.
He's on my ignore, so I'll keep it that way.
Ok, I unignored you.......
..........and I have no idea where you are getting your info. Of course, wildfires burn timber. That's always been the case. Of course, an escaped prescribed burn will burn timber. What is your point?
Controlled burns do not "burn high quality timber".
What is your information source?
I'm thinking you are still merely a troll.
It doesn't make sense to me either. I don't mean to sound like some kind of expert here. I'm not. I don't know much about sawmills and I sure don't know much about all the economics involved.
I took you off IGNORE long enough to see that you're still as much of a fatuous ignoramus as you've always been.
I thought that maybe, just once, you would post something in the F&L section that had some useful content or even a smidgen of helpful information. I should have known better.
Back on IGNORE for you.
so to clear up at least one thing i'm stuck on, your saying that it costs more to produce lumber here because of the high tech systems the mills use now?
if that is the case then maybe we use to much tech and not enough common sense.
Ok, so I've mostly stayed out of this pissing contest...
As far is imports, Meh, its cheaper for third world countries to make **** products and ship them here then it is for americans to build quality products, and sell them at home, this has more to do with politics then economy, mostly since america's import tariffs are low or nonexistant, which they should not be. It cost a member here $300 to have a clapped out basket case saw sent to Scotland, to send it back would cost nothing but shipping.
Enter your email address to join: