Derek
ArboristSite Guru
Hay I did it, just to check it wasent a fluke, I
tall and close
- Thread starter Derek
- Start date
Help Support Arborist Forum:
Derek
ArboristSite Guru
Hay I did it, just to check it wasent a fluke, I hope no one minds ill send another. First wires are 35- 39 m off the ground, second 59- 63 m and the mighty third wires are between75-80m from ground.
All pretty straight forward pole strapping but come within 6 m and you will certainly feel it. I will leave this tree at 30 meters.
All pretty straight forward pole strapping but come within 6 m and you will certainly feel it. I will leave this tree at 30 meters.
MasterBlaster
TreeHouse Elder
Hey there, Derek. You need to add your posts to the thread you've already started, instead of starting a new thread each time.
Welcome to AS!
Welcome to AS!
Derek
ArboristSite Guru
last one
It was a fluke, SENT SAME SHOT TWICE,sorry and disregard
"tall and close"number 2. Would liked to of sent it virticly(wifes not home.)
My groundie sent up a refuelled saw,with his camera, yelling something about my veiw of the wires, heres my veiw.
Thanks for sharing, And please be carefull . Kind regards Derek.
It was a fluke, SENT SAME SHOT TWICE,sorry and disregard
"tall and close"number 2. Would liked to of sent it virticly(wifes not home.)
My groundie sent up a refuelled saw,with his camera, yelling something about my veiw of the wires, heres my veiw.
Thanks for sharing, And please be carefull . Kind regards Derek.
MasterBlaster
TreeHouse Elder
Brian said, "Please?"
And told someone they were 'rude?'
Wow!
And told someone they were 'rude?'
Wow!
Kneejerk Bombas
ArboristSite King
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2001
- Messages
- 36,971
- Reaction score
- 9,983
Isn't it rude to call someone rude?
SteveBullman
User Formerly known as stephenbullman
no need to drop your nuts over it
I don't know about the multiple threads part of it since this is the first one I've encountered while catching up. I do know it's rude to post 1840×1232 images, compounded by having them rotated 90°, with the ultimate "feature" of being grainy, crappy-quality images.
Glen
Glen
This is the "rotated" pic.
I want to say that I love to see snapshots and that neither of these images are "crappy". What I'd meant earlier is that they are not of sufficient quality (technical, not content) to merit such large file sizes. I do not in any way want to discourage people from posting nice snapshot-sized-and-quality images here.
Glen
I want to say that I love to see snapshots and that neither of these images are "crappy". What I'd meant earlier is that they are not of sufficient quality (technical, not content) to merit such large file sizes. I do not in any way want to discourage people from posting nice snapshot-sized-and-quality images here.
Glen
Derek
ArboristSite Guru
any comment
thanks glen,
Meanwhile any comment on the tree? I would sound pretty RUDE if i were to count the amount of words said about my cpu and photography skills, what about my part in the climbing world.
thanks glen,
Meanwhile any comment on the tree? I would sound pretty RUDE if i were to count the amount of words said about my cpu and photography skills, what about my part in the climbing world.
