SIRCHOPALOT
ArboristSite Operative
bwalker- can you point this guy to the thread we had the other day? maybe it will help him. I don't know how to do that stuff yet.
bwalker said:I say the guy was a total and complete idiot! he didnt happen to work for Amsoil did he?
.
The problem with redline 2 stroke racing oil and it lack of a corrosion inhibitors is well known among many older dirt bike rider's. Especially ones that live in high humidity areas. I have seen the very dark colored brass jets, rust on crank halfs, and pitted bearings 1st hand on 2 bikes that have run redline 2 stroke racing oil. Don't know if they ever changed the formula as this was years ago.SIRCHOPALOT said:Your sever dislike for redline is relly starting to make me think. I will do some more test with this stuff. I have never had a problem, but will take anyones input to help avoid one. how long ago did you have the problem with the redline? I do remember some racers saying they had a problem about 7-8 yrs ago, but they were running some funky gas, so I just figured the gas was the problem.
The Echo PowerBlend is a very good oil you will do no wrong by using it. I know that it looks nearly the same as Citgo oil on MSDS but they don't tell you every thing. For example Echo PowerBlend contains a fuel stabilizer, that is a very good idea in chainsaws. I cannot find anything about a fuel stabilizer in the Citgo labeled oil on this.Koa Man said:Now I'm getting really confused. I don't care how oils are made or what they are made of. My only concern is using a high quality product that will protect my equipment. That being said, should I just continue to buy Echo PowerBlend at $27 a gal., or try to find Citgo at around $7 a gal. and is Citgo really the same as Echo's? Should I pay a visit to the local Redline store for their stuff and is Redline's oil much cheaper? I would like to save money buying oil, but I also don't mind spending money for a quality product.
Crofter said:" 2. A person of profound mental retardation having a mental age below three years and generally being unable to learn connected speech or guard against common dangers. The term belongs to a classification system no longer in use and is now considered offensive."
I agree that there are many technical flaws in the explanation of oils in the original post. I am sure it was not done out of malice, so I think your response was a bit overdone for an opening salvo perhaps, No?
bwalker said:If I where the one who made those comments to Pioneer I would deserve a little ridicule. I have been slammed for making false statements on this board before and I delt with it by admitting I was wrong. No harm besides a little hurt to the pride, which tends to be a good thing once and awhile.
Once again, the only one slammed was the moron who made the bogus statements.
And I am no expert on oils, but I have taken the time to educate myself a bit. More than I can say for this so called "expert" that fed Pioneer a line of crap.