Torque, RPMs, Porting...My Philosophy

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Here's the 461 vs 660 stock with 8+ tanks through the 660
460stockvs660stockafter8tanks_zpsb279f22d.jpg
 
Finally the one were interested in. This is the ported 361 vs stock 461 vs stock 660. Notice how the 361 has a more hp at 12000 than the 461 and 660 and how level the line looks compaerd to the others.
361portedvs461stockvs660stock_zpse1aa87d2.jpg
That is awesome...exactly the point I'm trying to make in this thread. Notice how the lower RPM curve is just as flat as the stock 461 & 660, but the peak is moved up 1,500-2,000 RPMs, and doesn't fall off nearly as quickly at high RPMs. It's making > 4HP from 7,500 RPMs to well above 12,000 RPMs. Who wouldn't want a powerband like that?!
 
Awesome information Chad, thanks for your dedication and perseverance.

What a difference that dual port makes on the 660, I'd love to see similar tests on the 044.

It would also be great to know what RPMs that ported 361 holds in the cut (figure average hardwood with a 20" bar).
 
Here's the 461 vs the 660 DP Finally the 660 has a good edge on the 461
461vs660dp_zpsddedf88b.jpg



Thanks for taking the time to do the testing... But I think the most interesting will be seeing the difference between a stock, muffler modded and ported saw of the same model.

Using your data points I made a chart that makes the 660dp look a little better (it needs all the help it can get)
Lies, damn lies and statistics ;)

trans.jsp
 
Thanks Chad, Very interesting.
From the above graphs would it be fair to presume that "In general" the powerband
for larger displacement saws falls off more dramatically than their smaller displacement counterparts in the higher RPM range?
or is the major contributing factor to flatter powerband of the 361 the fact that it's ported?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top