Lorra
ArboristSite Lurker
boo said:That's not a very good way to make friends here.... Lorra.
Not a very smart and/or accurate statement you made there, if you've read much at all. (100 percent?!)
I could go on about how equipment fails, cops don't get shot at every day, and firefighters don't fight fires every day.... unlike tree workers.
I'm sure you would have a better appreciation, respect and understanding if your occupation was that of a person in the tree service industry.
Do it.... THEN bragg about it.
Maybe one day we will all be as perfect as you, until then we will strive harder for such perfection.
My take on all this is partly based on the responses I've seen in this forum, over time, whenever someone reports an accident, whether the worker died or was seriously, or even minorly injured. The backlash is incredible. The victim gets called every name in the book. I've read references to the gene pool. All sorts of derogatory remarks in reference to a worker who makes a poor decision, and ends up in a near-death circumstance. The one that immediately comes to mind was the newspaper article that someone posted, of a tree worker who was hanging for two hours. There was a photo of him hanging, and his ladder was out of reach. The backlash was never-ending. Yes, equipment fails and the manufacturer is at fault. But every tree-fall incident I've read, or incident in which someone on the ground gets hit by falling branches, involves poor judgment--not my opinion, but the opinion of other arborists reviewing the accident, speculating about cause, improper rigging, improper knots, not wearing chaps, this and that. The word "idiot" and other similar words come up a lot. I rarely hear "law of averages" or "everything was done properly." So that's where my perspective comes from. Though cops and firefighters don't do dangerous things every day eight hours a day, I was referring to percentage of fatalities relative to time spent on the job.