You bought an $8000 splitter thinking you would strike it rich...
maybe your plan should have started with finding out what the going rate is for splitting wood...
That had to have cost him over $12,000. Nice setup though. I love your conveyor. A conveyor is the next thing I need.
Splitting wood for other people was not why originally bought the splittet. I originally bought it to split wood for myself. And I don't want to "strike it rich". I Just don't want to go out waste my time by working for nothing.
The discussion is revolving too much around the hourly rate, which is based in part on the original cost of the splitter. The real bottom line, as has been pointed out is what is the final cost of a cord of wood for the end user. In your market of $200 a cord for split wood, your proposed splitting service must be able to undercut that $200 mark by at least $50 to get people interested. After all, with the rounds sitting there waiting for you, an awful lot of the work, (dropping, limbing, dealing with the brush, cutting the wood to length), has already been done by someone else. If that work was done by a tree service, the property owner has spent a fair amount of money to get that far. There may be some times where a homeowner has a tree or two taken down, and would pay you to split it. But if it's just one or two trees, there may not be enough wood to make the trip worthwhile for you. And the people most likely to call you will be folks with enormous sized blocks of wood that will be way more labor intensive than the average firewood log.
Now, charging by the cord has a few logistical problems of it's own. You pull into someones yard and there's a big pile of wood there. It's tough to accurately estimate how many cords are in that pile. The only way to be sure is to stack it as you go, but that would add a bunch of labor to the project.
Not trying to shoot down your idea; just trying to point of a few things that you might run into. You got yourself a nice splitter, and you're ready to dig in and go to work, (and I admire being stubborn). But I think it's best to get as much wood from the tree companies you are hooked up with and process and sell the wood yourself. Then you are dealing in the known quanity of $200 for a cord of wood. But to try and insert yourself into the middle of the process and just do the splitting exposes you to an ever changing set of variables where the numbers are seldom going to come out right.
How long does it take you to split a cord?
Now, charging by the cord has a few logistical problems of it's own. You pull into someones yard and there's a big pile of wood there. It's tough to accurately estimate how many cords are in that pile. The only way to be sure is to stack it as you go, but that would add a bunch of labor to the project.
I'm hooked up with a tree company in my area and all they do is drop the tree, chip the limbs, and cut the logs into manageable pieces. They call me to take it away as long as if its enough wood and if its close enough. I could call them and ask them to recommend me to homeowners that need there logs made into firewood.
Ok I can admit that I might be a little high. So I'll drop it down to $80 an hour. Those first guys have a fly wheel splitter. First knot they hit they won't know what to do. And they don't have a log lift so how are those guys going to split a 100 pound log. And how come you didn't mention they carge $100 an hour for logs larger than 24 inches. What are they going to do measure every log to check if it's 24 inches. It'll turn into $100 an hour for one 24 inch log and 5 cords of 12 inch logs. The last guy is charging $35 an hour so he is probably using a vertical splitter. If it's a vertical splitter that is basically stealing money cause he will end up making more money than me for splitting the same amount wood cause it'll take him 2 or 3 times as long as me.
This is by no means a dig on you and your thinking but if a guy couldn't lift a 100 pound log on his own, he shouldn't even think about doing this kind of work. And they have 2 guys. I split a lot of wood and would love to upgrade to a larger model with a log lift but I sure as hell wouldn't be using it on 100 pound logs because it would slow me down too much.
Read all of my posts first and then tell me I'm not taking advice. I already conceded and said I think I might lowe it to $80 an hour. But it seems like I would be better off going out and buying a $1,000 vertical splitter and charging $35 an hour cause I will end up making more money. I don't know who would pay that cause you might as well just use the cash in your stove to heat your house. At $80 an hour I think I am reasonable compared to a vertical splitter at $35-$50 an hour. With my splitter I get more production so I have to charge more.
I'd skip that charging by the hour stuff. Charge by the cord. That's how wood is sold, so it is the figure people want to discuss and are familiar with.
I think I should make more then some guy with a vertical splitter that will take a week to split the same amount of wood that I can split in a day. What does everyone think about $80 an hour?
I can lift a 100 pound log but it's not like I want to do it more than a few times a day. Even though I can do it it doesn't mean I want to. Stop lying that was a dig and it was a pretty good one:msp_tongue:.
Now what are you gonna do with it? Here's an anticdote for you....A backhoe cost about $85,000 new...I need to get $100 bucks per hour to make it pay for itself. I rarely charge by the hour so I don't have to justify the "perceived high hourly rate" so I charge by the job and the client can put a set price on his investment. For example, I might bid a septic leach field dig & backfil for $1100 and usually be done in less than 8 hours. do the math...It's simple psychology.