Hi,
I've decided to see if I can pick up a used 50cc or so saw, to use with my existing MS180 or maybe replace it. It will be my biggest saw so would like something that can run a long bar when needed, rather than just for quicker cutting with a short bar.
First thought was Stihl based on my experience with the MS180 which was 10 years old when I got it and still going strong at 15. However there's a problem, over here their obvious model the MS261 is a problem and has suffered from bearing and crank problems since launch. There's a possibility that the v2 models post 2016 may be OK, but then again maybe they're too new to show it.
So my options would seem to be go older with MS260, go Husky or go non-pro with MS290/291.
Just wondered what peoples thoughts were. Are there some particular models more suited than others for running a longer bar and cutting slowly, rather than high speed with short bar. And what would be lost by choosing non-pro from Stihl (or Husky if they have such a thing).
Thanks, Tony S
(Edit - moderated some of my wording)
I've decided to see if I can pick up a used 50cc or so saw, to use with my existing MS180 or maybe replace it. It will be my biggest saw so would like something that can run a long bar when needed, rather than just for quicker cutting with a short bar.
First thought was Stihl based on my experience with the MS180 which was 10 years old when I got it and still going strong at 15. However there's a problem, over here their obvious model the MS261 is a problem and has suffered from bearing and crank problems since launch. There's a possibility that the v2 models post 2016 may be OK, but then again maybe they're too new to show it.
So my options would seem to be go older with MS260, go Husky or go non-pro with MS290/291.
Just wondered what peoples thoughts were. Are there some particular models more suited than others for running a longer bar and cutting slowly, rather than high speed with short bar. And what would be lost by choosing non-pro from Stihl (or Husky if they have such a thing).
Thanks, Tony S
(Edit - moderated some of my wording)