Thank you again 7sleeper. I really appreciate the amount of time you have spent on recommendations.
The budget I mentioned was just for the saw. I will be purchasing a helmet/ear/visor, chaps, gloves, boots before I make a single cut.
Speaking of which my wife and I used some loppers and a little hand saw to clear out over 30 evergreens to make way for the oak, beech, maple and ash. Now she says she wants a chainsaw. Hahaha
Your welcome! No problem at all!
If you consider a "small" saw, that can also be used by your wife, I would recomend VERY much a saw with a "easy start system". If it has a spring assisted, "electric assisted" or a decompression button is totally irrelevant. Further I wouldn't go smaller than a ~40cc / >2.5hp saw. With a saw like that it is possible to cover the workfield of the smaller range of saws => 30-35cc AND to begin raiding into the workfield of a true 50cc saw. So you begin covering a few more fields than what a stupid expensive Stihl 170 could do for the same price. Further work progress as a team (man and wife handling each their own saw) will be MUCH faster.
Further generally as a saw pair it is thought the the pair should be about 20cc apart for optimum performance. So either 40 & 60cc, 50 & 70cc, etc.
As a last comment, there are alot of quality brands out there. These would be a few that went threw my mind (a few companies merged so the same product exist under different names)
Dolmar=Makita, Echo=Shindaiwa, Efco=Oleo Mac, Hitachi=Tanaka, Husqvarna=Jonsered, Solo=Cub Cadet, Stihl
What I don't understand is what look's have to do with a tool... For me, it is all to obvious, that if a tool/chainsaw looks nice but doesn't perform I can just as well throw it away. If a tool performs well and looks ugly you can be certain I WILL recomend it!
7