KarlP
ArboristSite Operative
I see lots of threads asking which length bar they should get with their new saw. I haven't seen too many people suggest multiple bars as a solution for those of us who don't need (can't justify) a dozen saws.
Why not a well balanced bar that won't bog down plus a longer bar for felling big trees with a single back cut, cutting monster logs, or making flat stump cuts.
I personally find bars cheap compared to the price of the saw and PPE. I've got a 16" laminated and 20" solid bar for my 353 and a 24" and 32" for my 385xp. IMHO, both saws are extremely well balanced and well powered with the short bars. Both saws are nose heavy and need light pressure in hardwood with the longer bars. I _could_ run an 18" on the 353 and a 28" on the 385 all the time but then the saw wouldn't be as well balanced for 85% of the cutting and would be a bit short for the other 15%.
Not that I've done it (yet), but the inboard clutch on the larger Husky saws should make switching to another bar if the first gets pinched in a cut fairly trivial.
So why not two bars for each saw?
Why not a well balanced bar that won't bog down plus a longer bar for felling big trees with a single back cut, cutting monster logs, or making flat stump cuts.
I personally find bars cheap compared to the price of the saw and PPE. I've got a 16" laminated and 20" solid bar for my 353 and a 24" and 32" for my 385xp. IMHO, both saws are extremely well balanced and well powered with the short bars. Both saws are nose heavy and need light pressure in hardwood with the longer bars. I _could_ run an 18" on the 353 and a 28" on the 385 all the time but then the saw wouldn't be as well balanced for 85% of the cutting and would be a bit short for the other 15%.
Not that I've done it (yet), but the inboard clutch on the larger Husky saws should make switching to another bar if the first gets pinched in a cut fairly trivial.
So why not two bars for each saw?