bfrazier
ArboristSite Operative
Ok, now that I have you here... ;-) I really do have something to say about firewood!
I bought a 22 year old house and it came with a stack of pathetic leftover wood of bizarre random lengths from 12" out to about 22" in length, which is about the max my stove could use. When I got to actually burning the short stuff I had an epiphany. After 40 years of wood cutting I realized how vastly better it is to lay the wood in the stove endways rather than the more typical sideways because:
1. You have tons more control over the fire lay - pieces can be in the middle of the box or off to the sides.
2. Logs won't roll up to the front, or worse, try to roll out.
3. You don't have to reach into the stove as far (and burn your fingers).
4. You likely can fit more wood in. Seriously, somehow it works way better (for me anyways).
5. Smaller sized rounds are easier to move.
6. Easier to split 12" pieces than 16".
There are a couple downsides too: you have to make 25% more cuts, handle 25% more pieces, and stacking 12" wood is a high art form when it comes to making it look perfect. I take my time and cut every round right at 12".
We had a log cabin when I was a kid, it took 3' logs, so I cut three foot logs. For years since I simply cut 16" wood because that was the standard, and an easy 3 face rows to the cord figure wise. I guess I just needed to stop and think about why I always had done it a certain way. Now I cut 12" wood, and I'll never go back. ;-)
So what do you think?
Bob
I bought a 22 year old house and it came with a stack of pathetic leftover wood of bizarre random lengths from 12" out to about 22" in length, which is about the max my stove could use. When I got to actually burning the short stuff I had an epiphany. After 40 years of wood cutting I realized how vastly better it is to lay the wood in the stove endways rather than the more typical sideways because:
1. You have tons more control over the fire lay - pieces can be in the middle of the box or off to the sides.
2. Logs won't roll up to the front, or worse, try to roll out.
3. You don't have to reach into the stove as far (and burn your fingers).
4. You likely can fit more wood in. Seriously, somehow it works way better (for me anyways).
5. Smaller sized rounds are easier to move.
6. Easier to split 12" pieces than 16".
There are a couple downsides too: you have to make 25% more cuts, handle 25% more pieces, and stacking 12" wood is a high art form when it comes to making it look perfect. I take my time and cut every round right at 12".
We had a log cabin when I was a kid, it took 3' logs, so I cut three foot logs. For years since I simply cut 16" wood because that was the standard, and an easy 3 face rows to the cord figure wise. I guess I just needed to stop and think about why I always had done it a certain way. Now I cut 12" wood, and I'll never go back. ;-)
So what do you think?
Bob