372XP still available

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

ihbase

ArboristSite Lurker
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Location
Oregon
I just found a supply of 372XP saws still available. Judging by the reaction to the new saw, I thought it might be a good idea to pick up one of the old models. Do you guys agree? I do not see any advantage to the new model- am I missing something?

-Mike
 
ihbase said:
I just found a supply of 372XP saws still available. Judging by the reaction to the new saw, I thought it might be a good idea to pick up one of the old models. Do you guys agree? I do not see any advantage to the new model- am I missing something?

-Mike
Sweden is making the 372XP until at least 2011. I posted this about a month ago. You can quote me on this as I have direct contact with the engineers at Husqvarna.
 
Last edited:
Simonizer said:
Sweden is making the 372XP until at least 2011. I posted this about a month ago. You can qoute me on this as I have direct contact with the engineers at Husqvarna.

Even if that is the case, it does not matter if no one carries the saw for sale. All the Husky material no longer lists the saw and all of the dealers I know are no longer buying the saws.

-Mike
 
I've got 2 new ones on the shelf.

Thinking of getting one modified by one of the builders, but have not decided yet.
 
Yeah, we all love to blam the gov't for everything. But in this case and in the case of the 441, I do not see emissions regs equating to weight.

Both the 440 and 372 meet current EPA regs, so,,,, I see a new vibration dapening system on the 441 with the handle isolated from the intake/carb - could that new handle system be responsible for some of the weight?

-Mike
 
Simonizer You can qoute me on this as I have direct contact with the engineers at Husqvarna.[/QUOTE said:
Quote you huh? Wow, are you a reliable, quotable source? An authority on saws? ha ha ha ha ha ha ha,funny.
 
ihbase said:
Yeah, we all love to blam the gov't for everything. But in this case and in the case of the 441, I do not see emissions regs equating to weight.

Both the 440 and 372 meet current EPA regs, so,,,, I see a new vibration dapening system on the 441 with the handle isolated from the intake/carb - could that new handle system be responsible for some of the weight?

-Mike



I have been wondering why the 441 weighs so much more, if anything with the one piece covers and the air duct scoop (like a husky) it should be lighter. Go figure. I can't wait to see the new stihl whenever the local dealer gets them in stock

The 372 meets epa requirements, but manufacturers get incentives for making saws more epa compliable. The 575 has lower port timing numbers (from what I've heard/read) and uses less fuel, which relates to leaner carb settings....Yup, EPA has a hand in it.
 
Freakingstang said:
. The 575 has lower port timing numbers (from what I've heard/read) and uses less fuel, which relates to leaner carb settings....Yup, EPA has a hand in it.

I was unaware that leaner carb settings made the saw heavier. I'll have to try enriching the fuel mixture when my arms get tired...

-Mike
 
lo, that was good, seriously. You must be one of those types that would argue with a brick, huh?


Have you seen and picked up a 575? It is a totally differant crankcase. Must have lead in it.

I was referring to the 441 weight in the last post. Same saw with a new air filtration system and A/V mounts, and a pound heavier? The 575 isn't the same saw/case/etc as the 372.

Now, by running the saw at the recommended 150:1 amsoil ratio, it looses 2 lbs.


-Steve
 
clearance said:
Quote you huh? Wow, are you a reliable, quotable source? An authority on saws? ha ha ha ha ha ha ha,funny.
Listen Dikbrane, (excuse the spelling), you can buy the 372 from me until 2011. No BS. Why are you afraid to call me? (250) 287-9231. Call me tomorrow or STFU. I work from 7:00-4:00. How many 372's do you want? I can Loomis you 50 at the drop of a hat. Don't be afraid. Happy Good Friday.
 
Simonizer said:
Listen Dikbrane, (excuse the spelling), you can buy the 372 from me until 2011. No BS. Why are you afraid to call me? (250) 287-9231. Call me tomorrow or STFU. I work from 7:00-4:00. How many 372's do you want? I can Loomis you 50 at the drop of a hat. Don't be afraid. Happy Good Friday.


Simon you work on Sat.day WOW
 
Freakingstang said:
lo, that was good, seriously. You must be one of those types that would argue with a brick, huh?


Have you seen and picked up a 575? It is a totally differant crankcase. Must have lead in it.

I was referring to the 441 weight in the last post. Same saw with a new air filtration system and A/V mounts, and a pound heavier? The 575 isn't the same saw/case/etc as the 372.

Now, by running the saw at the recommended 150:1 amsoil ratio, it looses 2 lbs.


-Steve

That is a good idea. Mind if I borrow your saw to do a ratio/weigh test? Don't worry, I'll start rich...

I am not looking for an argument - I just prefer facts to speculation. And I get tired of everyone blamming the government we elect for everything that is wrong. I am sure you are correct about the changes in the new saws- but a lot of it does not make sense to me. And it is to easy for rednecks like us to blame the EPA for everything and think that we would all be better off with air like mexico city. I simply do not believe that the 441 gained over a pound because of the EPA.

For example - take motorcycles. That industry is subject to heavy clean air regulation, yet technology yeilds lighter and more powerful bikes each year. I just do not understand why some of the most popular saws for Stihl and Husky are gaining weight.

I thought some of it may be in anticipation of a leaner mix required by future emission regulations- this would lead to higher operating temps and perhaps these new saws were running a more robust internal structure in anticipation of those future demands - i.e. super lean mixtures.

But neither the 440 nor the 372 had any reliability problems- and so I do not see any other reason for the increased weight. My assumption would have been that the new saws would be lighter and more powerful than my old 260p/346xp/044/460 generation.

But I have been proven wrong.

Due to the bad response most of this site had to the new Husky, I found a 372 online for my friend in Vermont today. That got me thinking about the 441- Did I want to pick up a 372 or a 440 for myself as well today in anticipation of the heavier replacement saw even though I do not need a new saw right now?

I went to my Stihl dealer this afternoon after I ordered a 372 online for my friend. The dealer knew nothing about the 441- and so I decided to wait until I can make an informed decision. Right now, I simply can not understand why one of Stihl's most important saws is gaining weight. There must be an upside- but I have no idea what it is.

It seems to me that technology should be yielding lighter / more powerful saws. I like the new air induction system, and it looks sleek- but not sleek enough to make it worth carring 460 weight with 440 power.

-Mike
 
The MS 650 is an EPA child. I don't claim to understand them, but I know that the manufacturers do get credits or whatever based on their product line's fuel consumption, emmission, etc. Adding the 650 to the line brought Stihl more in compliance or gained them more credits or however it works, but regardless, it's EPA.

Now some things, like dual port muffler covers aren't EPA, but OSHA...

Jeff
 
fishhuntcutwood said:
The MS 650 is an EPA child. I don't claim to understand them, but I know that the manufacturers do get credits or whatever based on their product line's fuel consumption, emmission, etc. Adding the 650 to the line brought Stihl more in compliance or gained them more credits or however it works, but regardless, it's EPA.

Now some things, like dual port muffler covers aren't EPA, but OSHA...

Jeff
Excellent post and 100% accurate.
 
Back
Top