It's baffling to me that a company with a history like Husqvarna could manage to screw up something like a reliable chainsaw (re: those early 550s and 562s) based on what I'm reading. The 372s I used at my old job were stone cold reliable.
I had a new 362 about 18 Months ago, it took too many pulls to start, sold it at a lossToo bad the truth comes out long after the fact.
What are the early ms362 issues? I have a first-year model (2011?), still with very low hours. It's a beautiful saw for me so far. Smoooth, powerful, overcomplicated but very nicely made, and a bit bulky, but not bad. I ran it the other day and it just rips! Nice saw, but what should I be watching out for, besides the dry-ish clutch bearing?
I tune it a bit rich and run somewhere near 40:1, btw
A lot of the crank bearing issues were directly related to the filter, it would allow in copious amounts of dust when the filter loosened up. Very poor design.I had a new 362 about 18 Months ago, it took too many pulls to start, sold it at a loss
as I wasn’t going to waste my time in and out of the Stihl dealers fighting a loosing battle.
Never had a saw so difficult to start. The earlier ones had soft cranks, destroyed bearings
and crank in short time. They fixed that because all of a sudden that stopped happening.
I did notice that inside the cases were very dirty, nothing would survive that.A lot of the crank bearing issues were directly related to the filter, it would allow in copious amounts of dust when the filter loosened up. Very poor design.
It is, yet I wholeheartedly stand behind my statement. The first generation 550 and the 562 were garbage in my book. That's my opinion based on some experience, for what ever that is worth. Again when running they're sweet saws, however beside the QC problems, just looking these saws over it's clear not only was the design poor, but the Penny Pinchers got their hands involved. Just ran my 562 today it was nice weather didn't miss a beat, this is after heat shielding, carb reprogram, MM, decomposition plug and a new short block because of factory installed crank seal leak. The few 550's I've had to go through were even worse, each one had a QC issue, transfer covers all leaked, and intake boots were installed improperly, and they all would stumble off idle. The 550 went through what five different carved in three or four years. Yes they were that bad, sorry but it's the truth I my eyes. I have not had a 550 mk-II yet but so far you here nothing but good, and my 572 has been flawless.
Look all manufacturers have their problems especially with new models, how you handle it that matters, husqvarna's did not handle it correctly.
Right. Sorry you have a problem with my take on it snowflake.Again, you paint with a broad brush. Husky made thousands of these things. Do you have some sort of advanced degree in mechanical engineering or marketing to back up your statements? Got something? Well put in on the glass.
I feel like Andre supported his opinion pretty well. All we have is our own experience right? I've done one 562, an early one with the 43 carb. It came out great. Ive gotten into 550s lately and I see the issues firsthand. The plastic caged bearings are crap. Just a bad idea for the masses and a mix of mixes IMO. The off idle issue is real. If everyone went from a 346 to a 550 you'd hear a lot more of it. I haven't seen a leaky transfer cover or rolled intake boot myself but having worked on them I see the potential. I have experienced the hot start issue in whatever extreme heat southern lower MI can produce. That said, they're great running saws when things are right. Other than the one hot day I let the tank run dry on the 562 on it's side it was a champ.Again, you paint with a broad brush. Husky made thousands of these things. Do you have some sort of advanced degree in mechanical engineering or marketing to back up your statements? Got something? Well put in on the glass.
They're more threads on these saws then we can count, I even have one I started "with pics" although I think they were corrupted from the forum meltdown. How many builders stoped messing around with them, because at one point nearly every single one had something wrong? Yes that was largely resolved, but that's the way it was for awhile. How many even pro husqvarna guys, including well know dealers publicly acknowledge the problems? Standing up for, or being silent about a superb product doesn't help anything in my book.I feel like Andre supported his opinion pretty well. All we have is our own experience right? I've done one 562, an early one with the 43 carb. It came out great. Ive gotten into 550s lately and I see the issues firsthand. The plastic caged bearings are crap. Just a bad idea for the masses and a mix of mixes IMO. The off idle issue is real. If everyone went from a 346 to a 550 you'd hear a lot more of it. I haven't seen a leaky transfer cover or rolled intake boot myself but having worked on them I see the potential. I have experienced the hot start issue in whatever extreme heat southern lower MI can produce. That said, they're great running saws when things are right. Other than the one hot day I let the tank run dry on the 562 on it's side it was a champ.
I feel like you're being a little obtuse on purpose here to not at least recognize the problems Husky had. Not a lot, but more than there should be. If you've only ran personal saws and had good luck then yah, it goes back to my first statement.
The early starter housings were weak, and would break off from the post, that area was strengthening around the same time an extra case bolt was added.Ive only seen one 562. Guy pulled it until the recoil broke. Not the rope...the actual recoil. I fixed it...started on 8 pulls. Ran okay, i made 10 cuts, shut it off, came back 10 minutes later and nothing doing, wouldn't eben kick. I told him to take it to the dealer, it was under warranty.
For 800 bucks i would be upset...
Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk
I haven't had my fill yet but I'll definitely do things different on the ones I have left to build. So far the squeeze is worth the juice.They're more threads on these saws then we can count, I even have one I started "with pics" although I think they were corrupted from the forum meltdown. How many builders stoped messing around with them, because at one point nearly every single one had something wrong? Yes that was largely resolved, but that's the way it was for awhile. How many even pro husqvarna guys, including well know dealers publicly acknowledge the problems? Standing up for, or being silent about a superb product doesn't help anything in my book.
Right. Sorry you have a problem with my take on it snowflake.
Put it on the glass
- Snowflake? Seriously. Hey, I did not call you any names. What the hell? Pushed, they resort to name calling. What a real asset this dude is for arboristsite. Got nothing but hot air to show and nothing to blow. Once again, you got some kind of an advanced degree that allows you to say the things you do, put it on the glass.
Again, you paint with a broad brush. Husky made thousands of these things. Do you have some sort of advanced degree in mechanical engineering or marketing to back up your statements? Got something? Well put in on the glass.
A lot of the crank bearing issues were directly related to the filter, it would allow in copious amounts of dust when the filter loosened up. Very poor design.
Only issue I know of is the air filter wasn't the best, some complained about power, the one I had was every bit as strong as my 562.
because you haven't found another yet so you will have 4! LOLi dont know why i have 3-60cc saws...anyway
Too bad the truth comes out long after the fact.
What are the early ms362 issues? I have a first-year model (2011?), still with very low hours. It's a beautiful saw for me so far. Smoooth, powerful, overcomplicated but very nicely made, and a bit bulky, but not bad. I ran it the other day and it just rips! Nice saw, but what should I be watching out for, besides the dry-ish clutch bearing?
I tune it a bit rich and run somewhere near 40:1, btw
Enter your email address to join: