I wonder if he used the 650 in the 660vs395 thread:taped:
No way........................................He wouldn't do that........
.
I wonder if he used the 650 in the 660vs395 thread:taped:
Thats ok .....The 650 in place of the 660 is ok...We wont say anything...
.
I wonder if he used the 650 in the 660vs395 thread:taped:
Good pics Timberhauler. I dont care if its a 650, Its still a lot bigger saw than i own
I appologize for putting that in about 660/395 shootout..I promise I'll add some pics of the 660 so ya'll won't think I'm BSin'..
Hmmmm........Now what is to say that its not a 650 with a 660 tag on it.....We need a dealer to verify this now... Tear down rule needs to apply here.....
.
How about a Serial#??
Nope ...We need to confiscate all your saw's till an official can look at all your saw's...
tear down rule will apply!!!!!!!!!!!
.
Volunteering as official 660 breakem-down-looker-attem, shouldn't take more than 6mos.:hmm3grin2orange: :hmm3grin2orange:
Bar and chain opptional.
no no no no, she is only looking at that saw cause it so dam ugly, you know the morbid curiosity thing, like looking at a train wreck or car wreck or something. But that 395 is sure a nice looking saw.
Were taking applications .........I was thinking of a none bias guy's like .....Hmmmm..Cuttinscott or THALL........:hmm3grin2orange: :hmm3grin2orange:
.
no no no no, she is only looking at that saw cause it so dam ugly, you know the morbid curiosity thing, like looking at a train wreck or car wreck or something. But that 395 is sure a nice looking saw.
Were taking applications .........I was thinking of none bias guy's....
Enter your email address to join: