ball hone?

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
bwalker said:
I was refering to the extent of removing material to a tolerance altering degree. I suppose you could remove a meausurable amount, but it might take awhile. :)


Ah, gotcha. Yes, it might take a while, but then, working in a motorcycle shop (way back when), I've seen some serious damage done with a combination of these ingredients:

  1. A hone.
  2. A high speed drill.
  3. An idiot behind the trigger.


If a little is good, more is better, right?


:D
 
Oh Lawdy this could end up like the oil/gas ratio thing. :rolleyes:
Ole Ben was right,to a point,but they don't always use diamond hones.
Impregnated diamond will cut about anything,but they are pricey.We use them,where I work ,but the cylinder sizes and finishes are in microns[one thousandth of a millimeter]I have a few that fit my large bore Sunnen but I've never used them.No,by the way,I can't carry tolerances to microns,wish I could. :)
To get back to this gents original problem,if the "scratch" is above or below the ring travel,I doubt that any honing is needed.Do to the fact he was "tweeking " the ports,I would imagine it is below.
 
jokers said:
I don`t agree with Simon on the 1/16 over for the ball hone. 10% under bore is what I`ve always gone by for a piston ported engine. 240 grit should be sufficient.

Russ
The problem here becomes lack of symmetry. The operator has to twist and turn to spend equal time and force against the cylinder wall. With a small interference fit the ball hone does its work equally provided the operator maintains a relatively perpendicular stroke. I have performed this procedure over a thousand times with outstanding results. The thing we should be focusing on here is clean-up. Alternate between the solvent tank, degreaser and water and air about three times once you are done. The finished product should be perfectly clean before assembly. When it is perfectly clean, wash it one more time. Cheers.
 
Simonizer said:
The problem here becomes lack of symmetry. The operator has to twist and turn to spend equal time and force against the cylinder wall. With a small interference fit the ball hone does its work equally provided the operator maintains a relatively perpendicular stroke. I have performed this procedure over a thousand times with outstanding results. The thing we should be focusing on here is clean-up. Alternate between the solvent tank, degreaser and water and air about three times once you are done. The finished product should be perfectly clean before assembly. When it is perfectly clean, wash it one more time. Cheers.


I totally agree. The best thing I ever did you get rid of my three-shoe hones and move to ball. Don't sweat the oversize - the balls all bend over on the end of the wires nicely so you get a higher pressure on smaller cylinders (within reason). I particularly like like them when they have a little wear. I can get a perfect very fine crosshatch every time. For those worried about wearing though the "plating", you won't wear though Stihl's nikersil... I tried on a bad 26 cylinder to mess it up will a ball hone. Left it on for 30 minutes at 500rpm (normally it takes about 1-2 minutes). All I did was wear down the balls. Be careful with "plating". If it's a chrome bore, don't hone it... at least I don't... As for rounding out the ports edges, it doen't seem to make much difference at all. If anything, the result is nicer then the factory radiusing.
 
To hone or not to hone....

I used Scottr's scotchbrite pad.
 
that picture could not be any crappier. This one is only slightly less crappy.
Sorry.
 
kf_tree said:
here's the scratch's i was talking about

kf_tree....bottle hones work great for light honing and cross hatching a cylinder. Your cylinder only needs a light cross hatching. Anything more is just loosing up your tolerances. These hones are really quite forgiving and do a great job with just WD-40. Then wash out with hot soapy water and wipe out with a clean rag. I think I bought mine from Madsens.
 
scottr said:
Tom , did the scotchbrite pad leave a shiney or satin finish ? Oh , did you have wild turkey for Thanksgiving Dinner ?

Roast pork, the nonwild version. Hopefully the turkeys made it thru the week.

The finish was more satin than shiney(not shiney at all actually). The cylinder was very clean to begin with. Probably didn't need to do anything to it but felt like since I had a new gasket and ring, why not. If I get a chance, should be done with the JB Weld saw in a night or two.
 
Muffler before after

After on the left, before on the right. Outer muffler plate up top, baffles on bottom. Not sure if this classifies as a muffler mod. Especially since its on a .... well you know.
 
maybe better...

Note: the lg hole on the left muffler piece was already there. Not my handywork. I use a just large enough washer to hold in place.
 
Scott, I can't imagine it making a lg enough difference to matter with the screen in since I opened the baffle plates and the outer cover. It definately sounds alot "zingier" (is that a word?). I thought about putting it back in just for the sake of it. Maybe even add a few more holes.

Last night I got crazy and started priming all the rubbed off paint areas of the red 2.3. Guess I'll paint them tonight.

I've got issues!
 
Zingier

Tom , I haven't opened the Websters but I'll bet it's in there . As far as helping with the bigger holes , I think it will if you plan on keeping the screen in . My 2000 has a 32 by 32 screen which has about 51% open area . When I took the baffles and screen out of my 2000 it seemed to be too open but that saw needs a new ring and seals . I'm cautious about rpm in a reed valve engine . The last cylinder picture showed the satin finish better , thanks .
 

Latest posts

Back
Top