Thanks. Have always checked both but never focused on the sequence as being critical. I think we have confirmed the saw holds vacuum and pressure.Now just reverse it and you got it right. Vacuum to test seals first then pressure.
Thanks. Have always checked both but never focused on the sequence as being critical. I think we have confirmed the saw holds vacuum and pressure.Now just reverse it and you got it right. Vacuum to test seals first then pressure.
Yes. I don't understand your point. And I also don't understand why so high of a vacuum is needed when a saw normally runs at 5-10 in.You’re not listening, instead you’re replying with statements that are irrelevant to my question.
I want to help, but I’m not going to continue to repeat myself. Good luck with your repair.
You using a mityvac?Yes. I don't understand your point. And I also don't understand why so high of a vacuum is needed when a saw normally runs at 5-10 in.
The bottom line is the saw holds pressure and vacuum while static and rotating the crank.
Yes. 8500You using a mityvac?
Right, then I recommend you do as I suggest when testing vacuum, because if you don’t you’re not testing it correctly.Yes. 8500
Vac will test a seal where it seals on the crank itself because pressure will push the seal closed on the inner lip ! I have seen them pass pressure, but vac failed. Vintage Engines offered good advice. Dmb said he would like to see the piston, so would I. Pics?Pressure to seek leaks (soapy) and vacuum to confirm. It's not always the seals that leak. Had base gaskets fail, impulse batbs leak, cyl bases crack...ect
Intake correct ?when you pull the cylinder off I would like to see pics of the piston side and top
That's not my expiereance.The smaller Mtronics have issues with more oil. 261 in particular. Never had issues with 661 and 40:1
I see that too. Looks like he is running a base gasket with silicone. No need to do that and gasoline disolves silicone.Is that just RTV sealing the cylinder or a proper fuel rated sealant?
Isn't that a metal gasket in there too?If it was silicone, could it have been dissolved by fuel thus allowing an air passage into cyl to cause piston issue as cyl would not be sealing against block?
Don't pull it until you pressure and vac test it.Intake correct ?
I am aware that Dirko is silicone and I wouldn't use it for that reason. I had a failure with a silicone based Threebond product years ago and vowed to never use silicone anything again.You guys realize that Dirko is silicone, correct?
Never met Angelo, but I know him. Been in group convos with him for a couple years. He’s not inexperienced at this. It would be nice to see some help offered instead of going in raw like he’s a newb with no idea.
As far as the p/v test, I agree with the vac first. But I’ve learned on my own time that seal issues that affect running characteristics are instantly noticeable on the needle. If it holds 7 on the vac or pressure side without falling off while you rotate the crank, it’s not an air leak that’s causing the issue. There’s no way in hell that a hairline leak at + or - 10 psi, but no leak at + or -5 psi is going to score a cylinder. At 10k rpm there isn’t time for that kind of pressure differential to happen on every revolution anyway. You’re talking 2-3psi each way from 0 max
Enter your email address to join: