tdi-rick
Addicted to ArboristSite
Good point re the rechargeables Al.
I'm not anti digi, it's all I've used for the last 18 months too, although it looks like the sensor has crapped itself on the little Cannon PS now.....
AS for pic quality I dunno, that always came down to lens quality IMO, then the nut behind the viewfinder.
If you used print film, not trannies, the average 60 minute film processors had no idea how to develop film, it was always crap, so you had to send it off to a pro lab in the big cities just like the wedding photographers did.
I'm not anti digi, it's all I've used for the last 18 months too, although it looks like the sensor has crapped itself on the little Cannon PS now.....
AS for pic quality I dunno, that always came down to lens quality IMO, then the nut behind the viewfinder.
If you used print film, not trannies, the average 60 minute film processors had no idea how to develop film, it was always crap, so you had to send it off to a pro lab in the big cities just like the wedding photographers did.