Since the scam is up on whether this was a "rental" or not. Do you suppose the "rental agent" assessed damages for the condition the splitter was returned in, or were they too dumb to realize what shape it was returned in. If damages were assesed, how much OP?
Might have happened during a demonstration of what it will do.
I don’t think he will be back.....
It’s not a matter of CEO’s having a spine or not. The true sad thing is that it is almost always cheaper to settle vs. fighting a BS lawsuit.
According to the letgo ad, it has been sold. I guess the drama is over.
Wait a minute! Everything the OP said was a lie. So why would you now believe that the unit is sold because of a letgo ad? And how would you sell it by honestly saying, "Very low hour high end production log splitter for sale that is only moderately destroyed from abuse"?
Common sense would be to handle this matter in the courts, unfortunately this has become personal. I would rather see him loose potential sales.
I'd bet that he still owns it. And, that he'll try to hide a while, then go back to "easy money", through one of his hundreds of tricks. Maybe someone who lives close to him, can "check" on him occasional. Maybe one of the local tree services...Mudd, I'm guessing he put that on there to "remove" the ad. Looks like it didn't work though.
It could be they worked out a deal over the phone for Andrew to buy it back?I'd bet that he still owns it. And, that he'll try to hide a while, then go back to "easy money", through one of his hundreds of tricks. Maybe someone who lives close to him, can "check" on him occasional. Maybe one of the local tree services...
"Those who contribute the least, complain the most" seems to hold true.
N
It could be they worked out a deal over the phone for Andrew to buy it back?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J320A using Tapatalk
Enter your email address to join: