murphy4trees
Addicted to ArboristSite
Tree Brothers,
Daniel murphy checking in on the subject of elevating or raising trees. This subject ame up earlier in the "pruning practices" thread.
http://arboristsite.com/showthread.php?threadid=6521
In that thread I wrote about the many benefits that elevating can bring human/lanndscape interface. That is improve lighting, air circulation, lines of sight, headroom over paths etc.. Mike Maas and Tom D. argued strongly against elevating as a kneejerk reaction, performed by inferior arborists, and very damaging to the health of a tree.
After taking some time to "look around" and observe trees, I have changed my position. What I have noticed is that trees left with their lower branches tend to be very healthy and vigorous.
I still maintain that part of an arborists job is to solve people's tree problems, while doing as little harm to trees as possible. It will often then be required to remove lower branches over sidewalks, houses, driveways, etc... And after realizing what a dear price a tree pays for loosing its lower branches, I will look for other alternatives, before elevating.
I hope this thread will bring a higher level of awareness to this issue and help make elevating a last resort, rather than an regular practice for many. You input is welcome here.... Do you regularly elevate trees? How do you handle a customer that wants all his/her trees elevated? etc..
I also have been thinking about why un-elevated trees are so much healthier and will share some thoughts on the subject later. What are your thoughts??
Here is a pic of a customer's front yard, taken last December. This is a $700,000 neighborhood.... hardly your average looking front yard for suburban Philadelphia, yet the trees are in excellent health...
God Bless All,
Daniel
only part of the pic here got posted... the whole thing made it on the next post.
Daniel murphy checking in on the subject of elevating or raising trees. This subject ame up earlier in the "pruning practices" thread.
http://arboristsite.com/showthread.php?threadid=6521
In that thread I wrote about the many benefits that elevating can bring human/lanndscape interface. That is improve lighting, air circulation, lines of sight, headroom over paths etc.. Mike Maas and Tom D. argued strongly against elevating as a kneejerk reaction, performed by inferior arborists, and very damaging to the health of a tree.
After taking some time to "look around" and observe trees, I have changed my position. What I have noticed is that trees left with their lower branches tend to be very healthy and vigorous.
I still maintain that part of an arborists job is to solve people's tree problems, while doing as little harm to trees as possible. It will often then be required to remove lower branches over sidewalks, houses, driveways, etc... And after realizing what a dear price a tree pays for loosing its lower branches, I will look for other alternatives, before elevating.
I hope this thread will bring a higher level of awareness to this issue and help make elevating a last resort, rather than an regular practice for many. You input is welcome here.... Do you regularly elevate trees? How do you handle a customer that wants all his/her trees elevated? etc..
I also have been thinking about why un-elevated trees are so much healthier and will share some thoughts on the subject later. What are your thoughts??
Here is a pic of a customer's front yard, taken last December. This is a $700,000 neighborhood.... hardly your average looking front yard for suburban Philadelphia, yet the trees are in excellent health...
God Bless All,
Daniel
only part of the pic here got posted... the whole thing made it on the next post.
Last edited by a moderator: