Kneejerk Bombas
ArboristSite King
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2001
- Messages
- 36,971
- Reaction score
- 9,982
Vegi oil also take more energy to produce than it creates. That blows your biodiesel idea.
BostonBull said:Corn sucks as a source for cellulose!!! The GOVERNMENT is using it to help the farmers. Whats the purest form of cellulose around? WOOD! So by using corn, you have to ADD one extra step to the process just to extract the celluose. Thats like having to tune up your saw before every start. Its just a government subsidary helping farmers, once ethanol use takes off they will be looking for cheaper a way to make it.....which will be wood chips, or if alcohol in gas takes off it will be sugar cane from Puerto Rico and Hawaii.
brian660 said:petroleum is the most enviromentally friendly option at this point? yer joking right?
I give up, hell I shouldn`t have said anything in the first place, no offense but the more people who think like you the more job security I have, think about me when your filling up guys
Mike Maas said:There are different amounts of alcohol in fuels.
E85 is 85% Ethanol, 15% gasoline, and has an octane rating of 105.
It is very hard on rubber parts.
In my part of Wisconsin, we have 10% ethanol, which runs the saws slightly leaner than gas, but hasn't been a problem in the several years we've run it, just set the carb correctly.
In the counties outside a 5 county area of Milwaukee, they aren't required to sell gas with ethanol, just straight gas. Cars get better mileage on the straight gas (about 5 to 10%) and it is cheaper (about 5 to 10%). Gas stations on the bordering counties have flourished. People fill up before going into regulated areas, and drive from regulated areas to get the "good gas".
If you run regular gas and switch to 10% ethanol, you'll want to adjust the carb so it doesn't run to lean. I don't have any information on E85 in saws.
It makes me wonder about ethanol. Recent studies show it take something like 1.5 gallons of petroleum to make 1 gallon of ethanol, it costs more, and your vehicle gets worse mileage.
Same with Hydrogen fuel cell cars. Sure they can make cars, but the hydrogen takes more fossil fuel to make, than the hydrogen they get.
Steve here...What Mike said...nothing I own gets ethanol mixed gas...
MS-310 said:You guys should do some thinking on this, first read some not goverment funded sites.
We have a small scale still we produce close to 55 gallons a week(i know not alot soon more when we get a mid scale perment) I run this in all of my trucks and I run it in all of my saws. ethanol is a really good idea it helps farmers and all of us, soon you will se e-85 all over the place. My 2003 gmc loves ethanol a flex-tek converter is the key to most fuel injected autos.
I hate to feaking type (cuz i suck at it) I could tell you all about it or just look at www.dogwoodenergy.com there is so many sites.
they have been making e-10 for a long time now it boost the octane rating up
About wood cellulose, very true but that is what methanol is. Methanol is very rough on rubber and magnessum. They are working on a wood ethanol for a sort time(I think) but the enzyme is very had to get as this moment.
It is harder to make fuel out of wood then corn, Im not trying to be a jack aZZ but its not a government subsidary helping farmers, it hasnt help any around here plus the goverment doesnt see the cash flow compared to the oil companys......
ETHANOL ROCKS
brian660 said:petroleum is the most enviromentally friendly option at this point? yer joking right?
Mike Maas said:Ok, please explain this to me and talk in simple terms so I can understand.
Why doesn't the dogwood still use ethanol for fuel to heat it?
I assume it's because it would take more ethanol to run the still than it would make. Otherwise you could just run a small tube off the top, taking part of the ethanol you are making, to run the still.
What I think you are doing in ethanol production, is using energy in the form of wood or electricity to make less energy in the form of ethanol.
BlueRidgeMark said:Look up "energy density".
If it takes burning fossil fuels to create alternative energy, you have to consider how much energy you have burned in fossil fuels to get the energy output from the alternative fuels.
Except for making alcohol out of sugar cane (SUGAR, NOT CELLULOSE FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!!), I'm not aware of any large scale alternative fuel that is a net energy gain.
Biodiesel succeeds on a small scale, but only because the main component is waste veggie oil. I don't think there's enough supply to make it a large scale reality.
MS-310 said:Yes we use wood, works fine.
If ethanol production was not worth the money would any company have made it?????? The ford model T was built to run "CORN FUEL".
What ever you guys can pay $2.50 to 3.50 a gal for gas and make green house gases and I will make my fuel for $1.10 to $1.23 a gal and make more HP and better for the air.
eric_271 said:So you are saying for example, there is more energy in a cup of methanol then a cup of gas?
BlueRidgeMark said:Take away the government subsidies and THEN ask that question.[/QUOTE
I did ask you the right question, there isnt any goverment subsidies when small scale still are used and we can still make it cheap.
BlueRidgeMark im sure you know your stuff about some thing but this field you dont know very much about ethanol production, so pls dont talk about unless you know, most people dont know much about it so its cool to teach people the right thing. IM sorry mark if I said any thing to piss you off, I mean no harm in this message. Thanks for the arguement.
Jack
eric_271 said:So you are saying for example, there is more energy in a cup of methanol then a cup of gas?
Enter your email address to join: