RaisedByWolves said:
Monkey, Mabye your confused by the fact that higher octane fuels are harder to atomize?
Hi,
no there is no confusion on my part. High octane fuels ARE more resistant to ignition, that is what allows you to build high compression engines to get more power. Don't confuse harder to ignite with harder to burn. I have never heard anything about high octane fuel being harder to atomize so I can't comment on that.
I am just using simple logic and a basic understanding of organic chemistry (admittedly from a long, long time ago...) to work this out so far. The simple logic being:
low octane fuel ignites without a spark.
and
high octane fuel needs a spark (preferably a good strong spark) to ignite it, remember that even a weak spark can cause ignition problems.
therefore - low octane fuel ist easier to ignite than high octane fuel, which is another way of saying - high octane fuel is harder to ignite than low octane fuel. Nobody can argue against that logic, can they?
I am also not saying that fuel does not lose some of its octane rating when it is stored ( poorly stored ), but that I don't believe that the octane loss is causing old fuel to become ignition "resistant". You must remember that the octane rating only measures a fuels resistance to pre-ignition/spontaneous ignition/detonation (call it what you will) and not its ability to burn or its energy content.
Since a lower octane would make the fuel easier to ignite (if the octane sinks low enough you won't even need a spark plug anymore), there must be some other factor involved. I reckon it must be a more volatile part of the fuel mix that is missing in old fuel that causes the problem.
I'm still open to suggestions.
Bye