Did you happen to notice the brand and model of the carb?Tuning was a bit interesting because this apparently one of those saws that a small turn means a big difference in tune. I’ve got it pretty close now and will monitor it as I run it more.
Did you happen to notice the brand and model of the carb?Tuning was a bit interesting because this apparently one of those saws that a small turn means a big difference in tune. I’ve got it pretty close now and will monitor it as I run it more.
No I’ll checkDid you happen to notice the brand and model of the carb?
I’ll definitely put it through the paces. It’s still not perfect but I know that saws run better as they break in so I’m just going to keep it on the rich side for a few more tanks.I purchased a 435 not too long after they came out. I found it a little "funny" to tune as well and it had a little "bogging" to it even when set to be four-stroking pretty heavily. It kind of worked itself thru all that and was a pretty decent running saw for me except it had "hot-soak" issues and refused to work well in hot-humid weather no matter what I did to it.
What a shame too because it was pretty impressive for a cheap box-store type saw. I replaced it with an Echo CS-370 and it's not as powerful but has been dead solid reliable now for many years and my "go-to" saw for small work here.
I'm interested in how the 130 pans out. I still remember WAY back when Husqvarna did the rebadged Poulan's, biggest POS of a saw I ever added to my line-up, I swear mine was possessed!..........FWIW......Cliff
Interesting to hear that you didn’t like the Pou-varna saws. My first saw was a 1991 Husqvarna 41 which I ran for 28 years of occasional use with nothing but a carb kit. And I’m loving the 142 in my stable once I did a de-cat and muffler mod.I purchased a 435 not too long after they came out. I found it a little "funny" to tune as well and it had a little "bogging" to it even when set to be four-stroking pretty heavily. It kind of worked itself thru all that and was a pretty decent running saw for me except it had "hot-soak" issues and refused to work well in hot-humid weather no matter what I did to it.
What a shame too because it was pretty impressive for a cheap box-store type saw. I replaced it with an Echo CS-370 and it's not as powerful but has been dead solid reliable now for many years and my "go-to" saw for small work here.
I'm interested in how the 130 pans out. I still remember WAY back when Husqvarna did the rebadged Poulan's, biggest POS of a saw I ever added to my line-up, I swear mine was possessed!..........FWIW......Cliff
What didn’t work on it?Pretty sure my orange Poulan was a 41 from the early 1990's. It never worked well from day one, got shelved, then sold years later on Ebay....I don't miss it......Cliff
I have a near MINT condition 50 Special that came out of my brother-in-laws Estate that has maybe 2-3 hours total run time on it.........Cliff
View attachment 776633 View attachment 776634
Remind me, what went wrong with it?I just got really disappointed at my 445, even the 32cc Dolmar/Makita has a metal engine at least, the 445 has a metal cylinder that sits on top of a plastic bottom case - half the crank bearing rests on the plastic frame.
Mine is in a box at the attic, I just wants to forget all about it. If the seller / Husky had given some useful information of the key factors; 1 single guide bar bolt anchored in plastic, bottom half crankcase is plastic - I would have made a different choice.
Remind me, what went wrong with it?
Enter your email address to join: