That's a gigantic issue for someone to tackle! Right off the bat, I'd say liability would be your largest issue. At school, programs are being closed and shutdown almost daily because of liability and insurance issues. If it doesn't have the approval of Risk Management, it doesn't happen. Unfortunately, we're watching our climbing and pruning opportunities get taken out of our own hands at the moment.
I'm not saying that what you're asking couldn't happen - it could, but it's not as simple as you're implying nor is it the negiligence of our industry that we don't have a program like that already. The way I see it, people used for aerial rescues like that would have to be full-time employees of the rescue agency, covered under their liability insurance.
Without that kind of an umbrella, who would be there to pay a lawsuit - the climber
- if something went wrong in the process.....
or even if things went perfectly! A sue-happy person could go after you even if you did everything right but the person still suffered or died. Unless you were employed by the rescue agency, the fire department would have no reason to accept responsibility in a claim like that.
I'm not asking you to bite bait, but I do expect people to back up what they say. It doesn't matter if I agree with your reasoning, but you should provide it when you criticize someone. I received a personal attack this week over this issue, and I'm still reeling from it.
Nickrosis