Oh bull shat. Crooks and dumb Azzs need to be outed so they can't screw people over..I only just started reading this thread so cant comment on any further than the first handful of messages. Why dont you email him direct, he always says to email because there are just too many comments. It's always the same as soon as anyone asks there is a barrage of negative comments and I would say 99% who run harvey down know nothing about the bloke just that he got a YouTube channel. Give the guy a break instead of run him down, we should be helping each other not pouring petrol on the fire but if people are bored and not happy with life I guess they feel good taking it out on others. And it's always someone who is out of sight. So stop hiding behind keyboards and be nice to the world, it's being made full of negative crap as it is so let's keep it off here. Now I'm going to read the rest but I have a feeling I maybe posting again later .
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAMrRtDJGU80JhYtxOkaMFw/videos?app=desktopAs a general 'view on life', there's some good points there though, in my opinion! And I did kind of jump on the bandwagon here, although some of my posts were meant to be funny, in the first place.
Something I was wondering about though... Is there actually a proper and standardized way to measure the power of a saw? RPM's, ok, and you can time cuts, but I mean horsepower and torque (at specific rpms, so the power band can be graphed, for example)? Or isn't there really a point to that? If a saw 'feels' faster to someone, that doesn't really tell me a lot, in any case.
Anyway, there's other important things too, for woods porting, like reliability, but a properly comparable 'base line' would be nice as some kind of proof.
A saw can be put on a dyno, but the results are only as good as the operator and the technology it's based on. With that said the easiest way is to test the saw in the wood.As a general 'view on life', there's some good points there though, in my opinion! And I did kind of jump on the bandwagon here, although some of my posts were meant to be funny, in the first place.
Something I was wondering about though... Is there actually a proper and standardized way to measure the power of a saw? RPM's, ok, and you can time cuts, but I mean horsepower and torque (at specific rpms, so the power band can be graphed, for example)? Or isn't there really a point to that? If a saw 'feels' faster to someone, that doesn't really tell me a lot, in any case.
Anyway, there's other important things too, for woods porting, like reliability, but a properly comparable 'base line' would be nice as some kind of proof.
There was one line in the movie the Flim-Flam Man that made me think. George C. Scott, who gives a magnificent performance, tells his young protégé “You can’t cheat an honest man.”Talk about naive...
“It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” - Mark Twain
If its the youtube guy, he is still quite active.Before the wagons and vultures start circling does anyone know if the person in question is active on any sites? If so that is one thing but it is possible he has passed away.
I find BBR entertaining, and reminds me heavily of my dad. Matter of fact the first time I sa one of his videos I thought it was my dad.buckin billy ray has him "port" saws for him, and he raves about them. maybe you could reach out to BBR and see if he could help you get ahold of him? but then again that BBR is a bit goofy himself lol
With all due respect that sounds good but I am sorry that is not reality. I have personal experience in trying to recover stolen items and it is not as easy as some think it is.Porting knowledge aside. If someone stole my saw and I knew where it was the police would be involved. If I didn't get the saw back it would be considered a hard lesson learned. He is still making videos so take that how you want. Personally if it's not face to face it's not happening.
What do you have against BBR? I always thought his videos were informative and entertaining.That's the issue with YouTube, success on that platform has nothing to do with skill, honesty, or even information. It's all about entertainment value and knowing the algorithm.
Don't get me wrong, there are some knowledge people on YouTube, but there are also a lot of Iron horse and BBR types. What gets me is the fan base these idiots form...the fans practically swing on his nuts for this stuff.
But I do agree that law enforcement is a lot less motivated to retrieve stolen property than they where before the woke world we live in now.With all due respect that sounds good but I am sorry that is not reality. I have personal experience in trying to recover stolen items and it is not as easy as some think it is.
I admittedly haven't watched much of his stuff, but I don't think he's as good of a faller as he thinks he is. Also spur climbing trees that aren't being removed is kinda frowned upon nowadays...I watched a video where he was doing that. I don't think it's quite as harmful as some people think, but I can do it with ropes and ascenders, and not scar the tree up as I do it.What do you have against BBR? I always thought his videos were informative and entertaining.
I'll add that, I much prefer August Hunicke's videos to BBR.What do you have against BBR? I always thought his videos were informative and entertaining.
I used to enjoy Tinmans videos and thought he was knowagble until I watched him try to explain how to use a chain grinder.I'm far from knowledgeable enough about saw porting, or basically any kind of modding, to be properly able to discern between what 's high value info and what 's total bs, but I have to say I didn't watch IH's videos for long, as the 'density' of useful information is quite low, and he seems to be quite full of himself. His video titles are of the clickbait kind ("I will be sharing a huuuuge secret!"), also something that makes me suspicious by default.
Tinman, on the other hand (himself indeed a bit of a fan of IH, it seems, but that aside) is really quite humble, always going on like "this is just the way I do it, I'm not saying its THE way to do it" and explaining his thought process. He also includes failures / experiments that didn't turn out well.
Information density is higher, and for someone like me the explanations he provided with the cut-in-half chainsaw were really useful.
Can't say I've ever watched any of his. I don't really watch that much youtube. I did think that BBR's hand filing vidoes were pretty good for pointing beginners in the right direction.I'll add that, I much prefer August Hunicke's videos to BBR.
Enter your email address to join: