- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 16,765
- Reaction score
- 16,082
- Location
- Beautiful Rockbound Coast of Maine
Actually the thin ring set up was pretty hot........on paper......really the fault with them (besides now being NLA) lay in the oil and tuning/mixing of fuel at the time they were current. The "more oil is better" theory killed them quickly as the rings being thinner they has less "memory" and stuck in the lands easily from carbon build up. The theory behind them was that using two thin rings you reduced the friction to about the same as one 1.5mm ring but gained in the fact that there are two opposing end gaps to lessen compression blow by, increasing compression and with two spaced rings increased heat transfer to the cyl walls more efficiently than a single ring. I have a 630 V with the original thin rings that was in good condition when I got it but I took it apart and cleaned the ring groves, checked the end gap and put it back together even though I had bought a new Meteor piston for it. It is the fastest stock 630 I have...but I run only Stihl Ultra at 50:1 same as every other saw I have......not a big Stihl flag waver but have been sold on Ultra for quite a long time......probably there are as good or better synth oils to be had but I can get this right in town at a very reasonable price....and even with high hours you don't see hardly any carbon deposits......even in the ex port. The thin rings work excellent but there is very little fudge factor with them.......and for a saw design to be successful the general public requires a sizable fudge factor......thin rings failed there. Like giving Mr Magoo a Ferrari....