Any info on the angle adapter?
It's in PartSmart. I'll get a part number for you. Assume they still offer them.
Any info on the angle adapter?
It is perhaps 10 inches long and goes between the attachment be it string trimmer type or pole saw type and the pole with drive shaft inside. It is on the parts sheet for the ht250 and likely others. I got one and it makes the thing kind of heavy and more exhausting to use on the ht131. I really believe it is more suited for cutting horizontally on top of bushes than tree branches. I have not used mine much and more on the ht131 with the string trimmer attachment on banks reaching over a drainage ditch. The guy at a Deere place ordered it in for me, first one they ever did if I recall.Any info on the angle adapter?
I second the Echo but for the little use of one I have, I bought a battery powered Bauer pole saw because I have many Bauer cordless tools. For under 100 bucks, it works just fine for my use.I bought a echo extendable pole saw PPT-260 many years ago. One reason was it was real 2 stroke. Worked great and go to like 16' .
But didnt use it much over the years for homeowner land use.
I also bought a manual pole saw and later a battery pole saw for wife. Boy did those save me alot of work not having to follow wife around pointing out what she wanted out of trees.
So later on the gas one got sold. If was buying a again I would a echo again.
But check out the battery ones too. What my dad even went with for land farm use.
Own a PAS-280 set up now and love it but no saw head as wasnt needed.
I've had a Husqvarna 326P for over 20 years and used it quite a bit but recently the plastic oil cover on the chain head cracked. I've not been able to find a replacement part and so far my attempts to fix the damaged part have not worked so the saw is essentially useless which is too bad because it ran great. I've been considering the battery saws to replace this. I have some Makita stuff and more batteries for that system so I'm considering buying the bare tool. I'd switch brands but would be dealing with a different battery system. I'll be watching this thread closely.Both are good. I’d look at which one you have better dealer support for in your area. Makes it easier when it’s time to get pieces parts.
It is perhaps 10 inches long and goes between the attachment be it string trimmer type or pole saw type and the pole with drive shaft inside. It is on the parts sheet for the ht250 and likely others. I got one and it makes the thing kind of heavy and more exhausting to use on the ht131. I really believe it is more suited for cutting horizontally on top of bushes than tree branches. I have not used mine much and more on the ht131 with the string trimmer attachment on banks reaching over a drainage ditch. The guy at a Deere place ordered it in for me, first one they ever did if I recall.
You missed the point. More power breaks the drive partsI'm not a lightweight and a lot of what I cut isn't either.
I have an electric Kobalt. It works well for the amount of time I use it. But I wish someone would make a power lopper instead of a pole saw. That would be way more efficient for branches under 1.5" diameter. And flexing of the pole would be less of an issue.I bought a echo extendable pole saw PPT-260 many years ago. One reason was it was real 2 stroke. Worked great and go to like 16' .
But didnt use it much over the years for homeowner land use.
I also bought a manual pole saw and later a battery pole saw for wife. Boy did those save me alot of work not having to follow wife around pointing out what she wanted out of trees.
So later on the gas one got sold. If was buying a again I would a echo again.
But check out the battery ones too. What my dad even went with for land farm use.
Own a PAS-280 set up now and love it but no saw head as wasnt needed.
The battery powered ones are a bit slow, but it is the nature of DC motors to have lots of torque, so they do not stall easily.Torque would be top priority were I buying a pole saw again.
Pole saw operators QUICKLY learn that making a bottom cut first saves a LOT of time and frustration.
PS I've always wondered why they didn't build a pivot into the head so the blade could be adjusted to cut horizonal not at an angle.
I swear I seen a hand held one of those so far run by batt over winter. Havent seen one on a pole yet.I have an electric Kobalt. It works well for the amount of time I use it. But I wish someone would make a power lopper instead of a pole saw. That would be way more efficient for branches under 1.5" diameter. And flexing of the pole would be less of an issue.
Ryobi make a telescoping 18V lopper. Mine seems OK but a bit awkward when fully extended. Supposed to cut up to 32mm in green/soft wood.I have an electric Kobalt. It works well for the amount of time I use it. But I wish someone would make a power lopper instead of a pole saw. That would be way more efficient for branches under 1.5" diameter. And flexing of the pole would be less of an issue.
Milwaukee should have a pole lopper out this year?
https://www.acmetools.com/milwaukee...html?msclkid=b34a79902876168f17541c66db6117fe
NOT cheap!
I'm pretty much committed to M18 tools.
Enter your email address to join: