Ms-200 Pro

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
If our industry did away with every piece of equipment that COULD cause an injury we wouldn't have any tools.

Chainsaws don't cut people, people cut people:D.

That back handled 200 would make a good(although expensive) training saw for groundies. The short bar and light weight would make it potentially safer than a bigger saw. Don't think I'd be buying any though.
 
I'll tell you what I DO like about it... notice the NICE BIG HOLE in the rear handle? That's gonna be SWEET when you're cutting during a storm with 3 pairs of gloves on to keep warm... I'd like to see them adopt that handle design for some of the bigger saws, as an option.
 
What makes the top handle saw supposedly more dangerous. Handles closer together thus less leverage to control kickback or is it one handing?

Frank
 
aaf_lol.gif
 
This is the one place I disagree whole-heartedly... "two-hands only".

It's unrealistic, and not one person here can say they've never had to one-hand a saw.

That said, a top-handle design is far superior for that purpose in balance and handling.
 
and I never said a rear-handled saw had no use in a tree. As you can see, I use one on occasion...

<===============
 
Originally posted by Mike Maas
ANSI does not allow one handed operation, is a top handeled saw still better if basic safety rules are followed, or not and why?


So we all follow all of ANSI's standards?


Carl
 
I'm saying you never HAVE to one hand, and should strive to never one hand.
It does take more skill, but with practice, it can be done. Tie in high, use your lanyard. If you can position yourself skillfully, you can make the cut with two hands and do it faster than the one handed fool.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top