Tom Dunlap
Addicted to ArboristSite
Its not about gear, I'm not making my point clear. Its about moving forward and being open to change.
If traditional methods work, which they do, fine. But be open to considering moving ahead. Getting the attitude that trad works so prog is a waste is Luddite thinking.
Over the years I've seen many more trad climbers become better climbers by making the simple change from the TL to the Blake's. This change opens them to a whole different mindset. In short order they're using many other tools and techniques that make tree work much more fun. Oh, and easier too.
On the other hand most of the climbers who have stayed with trad systems don't progress. The move ahead is more about mental attitude than gear. Of course, there are some trad climbers who are gifted enough to climb well. Using modern systems allows people to progress faster. At the same time, trad climbers will hold onto their systems with a tenacity that seems like they're defending some sort of honor.
Trad systems to work but there is only a tiny percentage of climbers who will go back to a trad system when they start on the move forward. Heck, everyone has accepted some modern parts already. When was the last anyone climbed on a three loop bowline saddle? Manila rope? Oooo, I hope not. Manila was fine for Captain Jack Aubrey but not us.
Guy,
The training and assessment system in the UK is really good. The enforcement system is what doesn't work. During T&A, no, not that T&A...the climber learns proper techniques. The system is an attempt to have a standardized the training of climbers. There isn't a forced use of FCs or DEDA lanyards or anything like that. Heck, they even train the climbers how to cut one handed. Along the way though, they train the climbers who to position themselves to make cuts in a safe stance.
Don't throw out the baby with the bath water. I've spent time studying the HSE system and it is sound. Like I said, the enforcement or leveling of the playing field is lacking.
Tom
If traditional methods work, which they do, fine. But be open to considering moving ahead. Getting the attitude that trad works so prog is a waste is Luddite thinking.
Over the years I've seen many more trad climbers become better climbers by making the simple change from the TL to the Blake's. This change opens them to a whole different mindset. In short order they're using many other tools and techniques that make tree work much more fun. Oh, and easier too.
On the other hand most of the climbers who have stayed with trad systems don't progress. The move ahead is more about mental attitude than gear. Of course, there are some trad climbers who are gifted enough to climb well. Using modern systems allows people to progress faster. At the same time, trad climbers will hold onto their systems with a tenacity that seems like they're defending some sort of honor.
Trad systems to work but there is only a tiny percentage of climbers who will go back to a trad system when they start on the move forward. Heck, everyone has accepted some modern parts already. When was the last anyone climbed on a three loop bowline saddle? Manila rope? Oooo, I hope not. Manila was fine for Captain Jack Aubrey but not us.
Guy,
The training and assessment system in the UK is really good. The enforcement system is what doesn't work. During T&A, no, not that T&A...the climber learns proper techniques. The system is an attempt to have a standardized the training of climbers. There isn't a forced use of FCs or DEDA lanyards or anything like that. Heck, they even train the climbers how to cut one handed. Along the way though, they train the climbers who to position themselves to make cuts in a safe stance.
Don't throw out the baby with the bath water. I've spent time studying the HSE system and it is sound. Like I said, the enforcement or leveling of the playing field is lacking.
Tom