I had to rest and think about this for a day. I thought maybe it's time to pull the old classic "I know your are but what am I" or "I'm rubber and you're glue....what ever you say bounces off me and sticks to you" those are a couple of show stoppers right there.Maybe you should go back and re-read. You qouted me right away. You also started talking to me about turfers (groundies i assume) and setting lines, which i thought odd cuz you know i'm not a tree service guy.
Back to this high step- if the face cut is lower than your backcut where does the wood break? It breaks in the same spot as if the cuts are level. At the back of the face. Unless you have fibers exposed in the back of your face how exactly are you getting more vertical holding wood..
When the fibers break as a conventional closes the tree is at angle to the stump. How much of a step do you need to keep that angled butt from slipping up and over the stump? I've tried this many different ways and in only certain circumstances does that higher back cut give you any slip back protection. Hunboldt or a block with a snipe are your best bets when the tree has a possibilty of slipping back.
Attacking me personally with you inner monologue is kind of a ******* move considering the conversations we've had in the past. Maybe you think you qouted someone else? You may want to re-read.
It is said comedy is not prejudice and holds no bounds. There is areas I prefer to stay away from though. However I have a personal rule and that is; If my on line antics offend someone I repeatedly say bAby..bAby
I'm so joking. I always apologize.
My inner monologue was certainly not meant as an attack. I apologize if you took it as such.
I'll keep the rest simple
Some I talked about on the last post
I'll dismiss the reread comment and no comment on your step findings.
I'm sure I have cleared up the difference between holding wood and vertical holding wood so the rest I agree with especially the Jackazz thing
Never question the 'Koran'..its a form of doubting