As Nick has reminded us before, internal rope workings can be like stange Voodoo.........
i think on braided lines working, cranking, moving over an arc for 100% strength efficiency, of a standard flexible line of polyester/nylon braid; that 8x the line diameter for the pulley is the standard recomendation. The pulley should be sized and shaped correctly on the bottom and sides of the 'sheave' to support the 'belly' and sides of the line properly, to screech this high efficiency out.
Conversely, on a fixed hang without being cranked and worked around that curve of the pulley and entering all those dynamics, i think that 3x rope diameter for the mounting, for 100% rope strength efficiency, same rope construction constraints is the standard quote.
Orrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr something like that!
Peace,
:alien:
P.S. Because i've been maid to agree with you no who again in the same lifetime, i burden you with my favorite bowline and tying method....
i think on braided lines working, cranking, moving over an arc for 100% strength efficiency, of a standard flexible line of polyester/nylon braid; that 8x the line diameter for the pulley is the standard recomendation. The pulley should be sized and shaped correctly on the bottom and sides of the 'sheave' to support the 'belly' and sides of the line properly, to screech this high efficiency out.
Conversely, on a fixed hang without being cranked and worked around that curve of the pulley and entering all those dynamics, i think that 3x rope diameter for the mounting, for 100% rope strength efficiency, same rope construction constraints is the standard quote.
Orrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr something like that!
Peace,
:alien:
P.S. Because i've been maid to agree with you no who again in the same lifetime, i burden you with my favorite bowline and tying method....